23.03.2013 Views

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

34<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>FortisBC</strong> or the Company)<br />

<strong>Application</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Certificate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> Convenience and Necessity<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project<br />

Response to British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC or the Commission)<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Request (IR) No. 1<br />

Submission Date:<br />

October 5, 2012<br />

Page 273<br />

highly dependent on the magnitude and “firmness” <strong>of</strong> the customer response to those new rate<br />

signals. Given the timing <strong>of</strong> the AMI Project deployment and the implementation <strong>of</strong> new rate<br />

designs beyond that, there would not be any impact on the timing <strong>of</strong> growth capital projects<br />

earlier than approximately 2017.<br />

Response:<br />

111.2.3 Does <strong>FortisBC</strong> consider that any <strong>of</strong> these investments could<br />

reasonably be avoided through other residential demand side<br />

mechanisms, such as ripple control/load control programs or<br />

distributed generation? Please explain why or why not.<br />

In general, it is plausible that customer demand reductions resulting from load control (demand<br />

response) or distributed generation could result in the deferral <strong>of</strong> some load-growth driven<br />

projects. However, the potential impact is highly dependent on the customer uptake <strong>of</strong> these<br />

new technologies. <strong>FortisBC</strong> would have to determine the amount and “firmness” <strong>of</strong> the load<br />

available <strong>for</strong> shedding be<strong>for</strong>e it could be dependably considered as a method to reduce<br />

customer peak load. Given the timing <strong>of</strong> the AMI Project deployment (which is necessary to<br />

support wide-scale implementation <strong>of</strong> these technologies), there would not be any impact on the<br />

timing <strong>of</strong> growth capital projects earlier than approximately 2016.<br />

Response:<br />

111.3 Does <strong>FortisBC</strong> consider that a residential TOU/CPP rate which recovers a<br />

disproportionate share <strong>of</strong> sunk network costs (<strong>for</strong> example, 100 percent or 75<br />

percent) during peak periods could be a viable option to encourage residential<br />

customers to shift consumption to <strong>of</strong>f-peak periods and so reduce incremental<br />

network costs? Please explain why or why not.<br />

A reduction in peak period energy use could result in a drop in peak demand. TOU rates<br />

designed such that the price differential is sufficient to cause customers to shift consumption<br />

into non-peak periods would result in a drop in peak energy use. Collecting demand-related<br />

costs predominantly or entirely during the peak periods would be one such method <strong>of</strong> creating<br />

the differential.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!