23.03.2013 Views

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>FortisBC</strong> or the Company)<br />

<strong>Application</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Certificate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> Convenience and Necessity<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project<br />

Response to British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC or the Commission)<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Request (IR) No. 1<br />

76.0 Reference: Project Costs and Benefits<br />

Response:<br />

Submission Date:<br />

October 5, 2012<br />

Page 167<br />

Exhibit B-3, Excel Document: “<strong>FortisBC</strong> – AMI Excel NPV Analysis –<br />

17Aug12”, Line No. 12;<br />

Exhibit B-1, Tab 5.0, p. 81<br />

Theft Reduction<br />

Exhibit B-1 <strong>of</strong> the 2012-2013 Revenue Requirement and Review <strong>of</strong> ISP proceeding<br />

notes the following in Tab 3, page 11 :<br />

“System losses consist <strong>of</strong>:<br />

1. Losses in the transmission and distribution system;<br />

2. Company use;<br />

3. Losses due to wheeling through the BC Hydro system; and<br />

4. Unaccounted-<strong>for</strong> energy (meter inaccuracies and theft)<br />

Losses are calculated by using a two year rolling average. The actual gross loss rate <strong>for</strong><br />

2012 is the average <strong>of</strong> the 2009 rate <strong>of</strong> 9.23 percent and the 2010 rate <strong>of</strong> 8.42 percent,<br />

which is 8.82 percent. The loss rate <strong>for</strong> 2013 is further reduced to 8.76 percent due to<br />

the AMI-based loss reduction program.”<br />

Commission Order G-112-12 concerning the 2012-2013 Revenue Requirements and<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> 2012 Integrated System Plan notes the following in directive 1.c.:<br />

“The proposed Deferral Account <strong>for</strong> Power Purchase Expense variances from <strong>for</strong>ecast is<br />

approved and is to be amortized in rates in 2014.”<br />

Exhibit B-1 notes on page 81 that one <strong>of</strong> the benefits <strong>of</strong> reduced electricity theft is<br />

“increased revenues.”<br />

76.1 Please confirm if the <strong>for</strong>ecast revenue requirement per Line No. 12, Exhibit B-3<br />

includes an estimate <strong>of</strong> system losses, including system losses due to<br />

unaccounted-<strong>for</strong> energy due to theft. If not confirmed, please explain otherwise.<br />

Not confirmed. The revenue <strong>for</strong>ecast on Line 12 does not include any increased revenues from<br />

electricity theft detection and deterrence. Additional revenues (and reduced power purchase<br />

costs) related to electricity theft detection and deterrence were included on Line 52 Theft<br />

Reduction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!