23.03.2013 Views

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>FortisBC</strong> or the Company)<br />

<strong>Application</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Certificate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> Convenience and Necessity<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project<br />

Response to British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC or the Commission)<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Request (IR) No. 1<br />

Table BCUC IR1 5.1a<br />

Submission Date:<br />

October 5, 2012<br />

Page 10<br />

Targeted level<br />

Testing Outcome 1 2 3 4<br />

Longer seal extension Level 1 10% - - -<br />

Level 2 20% 30% - -<br />

Level 3 40% 30% 40% -<br />

Shorter seal extension Level 4 20% 20% 30% 60%<br />

Fail 10% 20% 30% 40%<br />

The following describes how the model used simulates the lifespan <strong>of</strong> the meter:<br />

• Each year a lot came up <strong>for</strong> compliance testing, a random number from 1-10 was<br />

generated. This random number was used to determine the outcome <strong>of</strong> the testing<br />

process. For example, if targeting level 3, a random number <strong>of</strong> 1-4 meant the lot was<br />

assigned to level 3, a random number <strong>of</strong> 5-7 corresponded to a level 4 and if the random<br />

number was between 8-10 then the lot was assumed to fail testing;<br />

• Based on this predicted level, an extension period was assigned to the compliance<br />

group, and used to calculate a new seal date;<br />

• A meter was replaced either when it was predicted to fail compliance testing by the<br />

model, or at the expiry <strong>of</strong> its seal date after reaching level 4;<br />

• This procedure was repeated sufficiently to simulate the entire life <strong>of</strong> the meter.<br />

Based on the model used by <strong>FortisBC</strong>, all electro-mechanical meters are expected to have<br />

failed statistical testing and there<strong>for</strong>e will need replacement by 2034. It should be noted that<br />

more than half <strong>of</strong> these replacements are predicted to occur in the first 6 years as evidenced by<br />

the following table. It outlines the number <strong>of</strong> electro-mechanical meters expected to be replaced<br />

each year due to seal expiration without an extension, and meters that are replaced because<br />

they are removed <strong>for</strong> the compliance sampling program.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!