23.03.2013 Views

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>FortisBC</strong> or the Company)<br />

<strong>Application</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Certificate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> Convenience and Necessity<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project<br />

Response to British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC or the Commission)<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Request (IR) No. 1<br />

Submission Date:<br />

October 5, 2012<br />

Page 174<br />

78.4.1 Have these production orders been primarily related to marijuana-related<br />

concerns?<br />

85 percent <strong>of</strong> production orders are related to marijuana grow operations.<br />

Response:<br />

78.5 How <strong>of</strong>ten has ForticBC been obligated to provide municipalities with a report<br />

identifying premises with consumption exceeding 93 kWh per day (under the<br />

Safety Standards Act) each year since 2006?<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> received one municipal consumption request in 2008, but <strong>FortisBC</strong> understands that<br />

no further action was taken.<br />

Response:<br />

78.5.1 Is <strong>FortisBC</strong> aware <strong>of</strong> the reason why the relevant Safety Standards Act<br />

limit was set at 93 kWh/day? If yes, please explain why.<br />

The daily consumption threshold was set at 93 kWhs (5 lights plus estimated normal household<br />

consumption) to assist in identifying potential commercial marijuana growers in private<br />

residences. A grow using less than 6 lights is not considered commercially viable. Please also<br />

refer to the Plecas study filed as Exhibit A2-2 by the Commission.<br />

79.0 Reference: Project Costs and Benefits<br />

Exhibit B-1, Tab 5.0, Section 5.3.2, pp. 82-83<br />

Theft Reduction, Indoor Marijuana Grow Premises<br />

Concerning the “Plecas Study”, Exhibit B-1, page 82 notes the following:<br />

“A 2011 study prepared by Dr. Darryl Plecas, RCMP University Research Chart at the<br />

University <strong>of</strong> the Fraser Valley, estimates that 13,206 indoor marijuana grow premises

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!