23.03.2013 Views

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>FortisBC</strong> or the Company)<br />

<strong>Application</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Certificate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> Convenience and Necessity<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project<br />

Response to British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC or the Commission)<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Request (IR) No. 1<br />

Submission Date:<br />

October 5, 2012<br />

Page 186<br />

82.5 Please estimate the average infrastructure cost per residential household <strong>of</strong> (i)<br />

the AMI proposal and (ii) an alternative where the advanced meters are only<br />

installed on the feeder level (rather than at customer homes or businesses).<br />

The AMI capital cost per customer is approximately $425. The installation <strong>of</strong> feeder meters only<br />

would not be effective in detecting energy theft (please see the response to BCUC IR1 Q82.4),<br />

but if deployed would cost approximately $10 in capital per customer. Please also see<br />

response to BCUC IR1 Q84.1.1.<br />

Response:<br />

82.6 Please describe the differences in IT costs if HH load data at individual customer<br />

sites is used as the investigative starting point to identify electricity theft, rather<br />

than the load data from feeder meters.<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> assumes that HH load data refers to interval load data, which in the case <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proposed AMI system is expected to be hourly.<br />

Hourly interval data consumption data without synchronized load data from feeder meters does<br />

not allow energy balancing. Energy balancing is per<strong>for</strong>med by comparing hourly consumption<br />

measured on a feeder meter to the synchronized hourly total <strong>of</strong> all customer meters<br />

downstream. This is a simple and highly effective method <strong>of</strong> detecting theft and other nontechnical<br />

losses.<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> does not contemplate additional IT costs specific to theft detection. The project budget<br />

provides <strong>for</strong> the addition <strong>of</strong> one data analyst to extract leads from AMI data on potential theft<br />

sites using existing s<strong>of</strong>tware tools.<br />

Response:<br />

82.6.1 Is ‘<strong>of</strong>f-the-shelf’ IT s<strong>of</strong>tware available to identify electricity theft using (i)<br />

HH load data at individual customer sites and (ii) load data from feeder<br />

meters?<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> is aware <strong>of</strong> “<strong>of</strong>f-the-shelf” s<strong>of</strong>tware that purports to identify electricity theft.<br />

Commercially available s<strong>of</strong>tware is primarily based on heuristic algorithms that attempt to detect<br />

theft using load data rather than energy balancing. S<strong>of</strong>tware-based heuristic algorithms attempt

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!