23.03.2013 Views

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

Response:<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>FortisBC</strong> or the Company)<br />

<strong>Application</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Certificate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> Convenience and Necessity<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project<br />

Response to British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC or the Commission)<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Request (IR) No. 1<br />

Submission Date:<br />

October 5, 2012<br />

Page 203<br />

87.1.1 Please explain how the power purchase cost from theft sites has been<br />

determined. Specifically, does this reflect the incremental generation and<br />

network costs associated with the power supplied to theft sites, or the lost<br />

revenue margin?<br />

The power purchase cost <strong>for</strong> theft sites has been derived from the BC Wholesale Energy Market<br />

Price <strong>for</strong>ecast. It is the marginal power purchase expense incurred to supply theft sites not the<br />

revenue margin.<br />

Response:<br />

87.1.2 Please explain how the recovered revenue from theft identification has<br />

been estimated <strong>for</strong> both scenarios and provide supporting evidence.<br />

Recovered revenue from theft identification has been estimated in the same manner in both<br />

scenarios. The following assumptions are made:<br />

• The detected sites are assumed to become paying sites in the current year;<br />

• The associated consumption is priced at the marginal revenue rate (residential<br />

conservation block 2);<br />

• The detected sites are back billed on average <strong>for</strong> 1 year with a 20% estimate <strong>of</strong><br />

collection success; and<br />

• The sum <strong>of</strong> payment <strong>for</strong> the current year plus the associated back billing collection is<br />

recovered revenue.<br />

This estimate is based on <strong>FortisBC</strong> experience in billing and collections. Please also see the<br />

response to BCUC IR1 Q85.4.1.<br />

Response:<br />

87.1.3 What rate schedule is the paying marijuana grow operation site assumed<br />

to be charged under and why?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!