23.03.2013 Views

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) Application for a Certificate of Public ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

<strong>FortisBC</strong> <strong>Inc</strong>. (<strong>FortisBC</strong> or the Company)<br />

<strong>Application</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Certificate</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> Convenience and Necessity<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project<br />

Response to British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC or the Commission)<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Request (IR) No. 1<br />

Submission Date:<br />

October 5, 2012<br />

Page 185<br />

detection and has concluded that the installation <strong>of</strong> feeder meters without the accompanying<br />

advanced meters as an effective tool to identify electric theft is not practical <strong>for</strong> the following<br />

reasons.<br />

• It is not possible to accurately synchronize the meter readings on the feeder meters with<br />

the cumulative consumption recorded by the current meter system as the readings<br />

cannot be collected simultaneously, (it takes a meter reader several hours to read a<br />

route and each feeder may have several routes which are read on different days<br />

depending on the geography and customer population).<br />

• If one accepts inaccuracies introduced by a manual meter reading approach to energy<br />

balancing at the feeder level, specific theft identification would still require repeated<br />

manual re-reading <strong>of</strong> meters downstream <strong>of</strong> primary metering to begin locating the<br />

source <strong>of</strong> unusual losses.<br />

The repeated and non-standard nature <strong>of</strong> the manual meter readings required <strong>for</strong> this type <strong>of</strong><br />

energy balancing would alert electricity thieves to the theft detection activities <strong>of</strong> the Company.<br />

Response:<br />

82.4.1 Please provide the results (or undertake and provide the results) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

analysis referred to above. Please state all assumptions used.<br />

Please refer to the responses to BCUC IR1 Q82.4, Q82.4.2 and Q87.2.9.<br />

Response:<br />

82.4.2 Does <strong>FortisBC</strong> consider it would be prudent to install the feeder meters<br />

<strong>for</strong> theft detection first, and only include any additional electricity theft<br />

related benefits in a subsequent AMI business plan? Please explain why<br />

or why not.<br />

The installation <strong>of</strong> feeder meters without the concurrent installation <strong>of</strong> advanced meters at<br />

customer premises is not an effective tool in identifying electric theft. The thefts benefits require<br />

the deployment <strong>of</strong> both types <strong>of</strong> meters. Please also see the response to BCUC IR1 Q78.3.1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!