Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association
Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association
Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IMC7 Friday August 16th Lectures<br />
380 - Polypore diversity in Costa Rica<br />
J. Carranza 1* & A. Ruiz-Boyer 2<br />
1 Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San<br />
Pedro, Costa Rica. - 2 Departamento de Historia Natural,<br />
Museo Nacional, San José, Costa Rica. - E-mail:<br />
julietac@biologia.ucr.ac.cr<br />
The systematic study <strong>of</strong> polypore fungi in Costa Rica<br />
started with the collections by Dr. Josiah L. Lowe in 1963.<br />
Recent studies have contributed to the knowledge <strong>of</strong> this<br />
group in Costa Rica. Currently, 81 genera and 284 species<br />
<strong>of</strong> pore fungi have been reported for Costa Rica. It has<br />
been calculated that the total amount <strong>of</strong> species will be<br />
around 350-400. Most <strong>of</strong> the species reported are<br />
cosmopolitan, and are distributed through out the country.<br />
Nevertheless, the highest diversity is found from sea level<br />
to 900 m with less taxonomic diversity on high elevations<br />
(2000-3000 m).<br />
381 - Biodiversity <strong>of</strong> Russula in Costa Rica: a first<br />
account<br />
B. Buyck<br />
Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, 12 rue Buffon, 75005<br />
Paris, France. - E-mail: buyck@mnhn.fr<br />
Information on Russula in Costa Rica is scarce and very<br />
fragmentary notwithstanding the fact that many hundreds<br />
<strong>of</strong> specimens have been collected, especially in the last ten<br />
years. Only very few new Russula's have been described<br />
from Costa Rica so far, but it is clear that the genus is<br />
highly divers and is characterized by an important degree<br />
<strong>of</strong> endemism. As can be expected, the Costa Rican taxa - at<br />
least in the more temperate mountain areas - reveal strong<br />
similarities with the Russula's from eastern North America.<br />
Unfortunately however, even in North America the<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong> Russula remains rather superficial. With the<br />
exception <strong>of</strong> some subsections, there exists no complete,<br />
modern, taxonomic study <strong>of</strong> American Russula that can<br />
serve as an adequate basis for a revision <strong>of</strong> the genus in<br />
Costa Rica. To illustrate the above, some examples <strong>of</strong><br />
biogeographically or otherwise interesting Russula's will be<br />
presented in more detail. The relation between species<br />
diversity, host distribution and general ecology will be<br />
addressed and compared with observations from other<br />
continents.<br />
120<br />
<strong>Book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />
382 - Diversity <strong>of</strong> Costa Rican wood-inhabiting<br />
pyrenomycetes and loculoascomycetes<br />
S.M. Huhndorf * & F.A. Fernandez<br />
Field Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, 1400 S. Lake Shore Dr.,<br />
Chicago, IL 60605, U.S.A. - E-mail: shuhndorf@fmnh.org<br />
Ascomycetes constitute the largest known group <strong>of</strong> fungi<br />
worldwide, occurring in all ecosystems and geographic<br />
areas as saprobes, pathogens and endophytes. Almost all<br />
historical reports <strong>of</strong> pyrenomycetes and loculoascomycetes<br />
for Costa Rica pertain to leaf-inhabiting fungi. Woodinhabiting<br />
taxa in these groups are virtually unknown - one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the only reports listed seven species in three genera in<br />
one family. A total <strong>of</strong> 531 specimens were collected from<br />
1996 to 2001. The specimens were distributed among 213<br />
species in 45 families. Species in six families were<br />
frequently encountered: 26% <strong>of</strong> the fungi collected were in<br />
the Chaetosphaeriaceae, 20% in the Lasiosphaeriaceae,<br />
12% in the Annulatascaceae s.l., 7% in the Xylariaceae, 7%<br />
in the Melanommataceae, 6% in the Hypocreaceae, 6% in<br />
the Platystomaceae and 6% in the Tubeufiaceae. In<br />
addition to our own collections, specimens have been<br />
examined from parataxonomists collecting in 5<br />
conservation areas in 2001 and 2002. Parataxonomists<br />
collected 1133 specimens <strong>of</strong> ascomycetes on trunks and<br />
455 specimens from plots. Field identifications reported<br />
specimens (% <strong>of</strong> trunk or plot collections) in the following<br />
groups: Xylariales (32% trunk; 35% plot),<br />
Lasiosphaeriaceae (13% trunk; 8% plot), Hypocreales (8%<br />
trunk; 7% plot), Melanommataceae (8% trunk; 4% plot),<br />
Platystomaceae (4% trunk; 2% plot) and others.<br />
Comparative data from collecting trips to lowland French<br />
Guiana and Puerto Rico show proportions <strong>of</strong> taxa similar to<br />
those for Costa Rica.<br />
383 - Diversity <strong>of</strong> neotropical smut fungi<br />
M. Piepenbring<br />
Botanical Institute <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Frankfurt,<br />
Senckenberganlage 31-33, 60054 Frankfurt am Main,<br />
Germany. - E-mail: piepenbring@em.uni-frankfurt.de<br />
After ten years <strong>of</strong> field work in neotropical countries,<br />
morphological investigations, and study <strong>of</strong> the literature, a<br />
monograph on neotropical smut fungi (Ustilaginomycetes,<br />
Basidiomycota) is accepted for publication in Flora<br />
Neotropica. 227 species in 34 genera are described. Among<br />
these 17 species and 5 genera were described as new taxa<br />
and ca. 34 new combinations were necessary. Further<br />
interesting results were obtained concerning the diversity<br />
<strong>of</strong> soral morphology, germination <strong>of</strong> teliospores, host<br />
ranges, and geographical distribution <strong>of</strong> the different<br />
species <strong>of</strong> smut fungi. However, much work remains to be<br />
done before we might have a rather complete<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the existing diversity <strong>of</strong> smut fungi in the<br />
neotropics. An overview <strong>of</strong> the diversity <strong>of</strong> the known<br />
neotropical species <strong>of</strong> smut fungi will be presented.