Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association
Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association
Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IMC7 Thursday August 15th Lectures<br />
http://www.glopp.net/) project does not aim at a simple<br />
compilation <strong>of</strong> data, so critical appraisal <strong>of</strong> the data found<br />
in taxonomic literature is necessary. As a rule, this entails<br />
experimental re-examination <strong>of</strong> the published data.<br />
Unfortunately, the morphological data so far used for<br />
Oomycete taxonomy are <strong>of</strong>ten ambiguous. This is<br />
especially important where only few morphological<br />
characters are available, as it is the case in taxon<br />
delimitation in most plant parasitic Oomycete groups. Even<br />
the total number <strong>of</strong> species in Peronosporales and<br />
Sclerosporales stated in the literature can vary very much<br />
depending on the underlying species concept used by<br />
different authors. To cope with these uncertainties, the<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> morphological with modern molecular<br />
methods is required. The content <strong>of</strong> the database will<br />
depend to a high degree on the results from this approach.<br />
275 - Discovering the crunches: the use <strong>of</strong> the GLOPP<br />
databases in rust systematics, ecology and biogeography<br />
R. Berndt<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Tübingen, Systematic Botany and Mycology,<br />
Botanical Institute, Auf der Morgenstelle 1, D-72076<br />
Tübingen, Germany. - E-mail: reinhard.berndt@unituebingen.de<br />
The knowledge about rust fungi (Uredinales) is still patchy:<br />
there are some well-studied pests <strong>of</strong> economically<br />
important plants, and there is the bulk <strong>of</strong> species growing<br />
on hosts with no obvious economic importance. The latter<br />
group <strong>of</strong> rusts has received much less attention<br />
accordingly. Another striking disparity <strong>of</strong> knowledge exists<br />
between tropical and subtropical areas and extratropical<br />
regions. Whereas floras or monographs on rust fungi are<br />
widely available in extratropical regions, the student <strong>of</strong><br />
tropical rusts most <strong>of</strong>ten has to confine to scattered original<br />
work that may not be handy or accessible. In our project<br />
we aim to compile a database on rust fungi with a focus on<br />
tropical and subtropical species. The database is geared to<br />
(1) facilitate the determination <strong>of</strong> rust fungi and to provide<br />
up-to-date taxonomic information (2) to supply data on the<br />
family affiliation <strong>of</strong> the host plants and on the known<br />
geographic range <strong>of</strong> the fungi in question. Additional<br />
information on relevant literature and personal<br />
observations are also included. The present database allows<br />
to retrieve data that are not readily available on the<br />
internet: - host family-rust fungus search - geographical<br />
search - synonymy <strong>of</strong> rust fungi - complex queries with<br />
several parameters Such options enable the user to reduce<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> possible determinations <strong>of</strong> a given rust<br />
fungus and to find hidden coincidences and contradictions<br />
in regard <strong>of</strong> host spectra, systematics, and geographical<br />
distribution.<br />
88<br />
<strong>Book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />
276 - Phytopathogenic fungi from South Africa<br />
P.W. Crous<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Pathology, University <strong>of</strong> Stellenbosch,<br />
P. Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa. - E-mail:<br />
pwc@sun.ac.za<br />
The appointment <strong>of</strong> I.B. Pole-Evans as mycologist <strong>of</strong> the<br />
former Transvaal Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture in 1905<br />
heralded the beginning <strong>of</strong> phytomycology in South Africa.<br />
As diseases <strong>of</strong> wild and cultivated plants became more<br />
well-known, several lists were published <strong>of</strong> these<br />
pathogens. The early lists were prepared by Doidge (1924)<br />
and Doidge and Bottomley (1931). The most significant<br />
one, however, was published by Doidge et al. (1953),<br />
which was primarily based on information contained in her<br />
voluminous Index <strong>of</strong> South African Fungi and Lichens to<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> 1945 (Doidge, 1950). In later years this list was<br />
updated again, and several new records added in a series <strong>of</strong><br />
three science bulletins published by Gorter (1977, 1981,<br />
1982). These data formed the basis for the book,<br />
Phytopathogenic fungi from South Africa, which was later<br />
published by Crous et al. (2000). An abbreviated version <strong>of</strong><br />
these data can be viewed on the USDA web site in<br />
Beltsville. Members <strong>of</strong> the Southern African Society for<br />
Plant Pathology required a more adaptable database,<br />
however, that could easily be updated and changed to<br />
fulfill the needs to the local plant pathological community.<br />
For this reason a new database template was developed that<br />
would support a CD-Rom and web-driven version <strong>of</strong> the<br />
database, incorporating illustrations, notes, all local and<br />
relevant publications, culture collection and DNA sequence<br />
data.<br />
277 - The polypores <strong>of</strong> the world - a useful database or<br />
are we still in the alpha phase?<br />
L. Ryvarden<br />
Botany Department, Biological Institute, P. O. Box 1045,<br />
Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway. - E-mail:<br />
leif.ryvarden@bio.uio.no<br />
Over a period <strong>of</strong> 30 years mycotas <strong>of</strong> East Africa, North<br />
America, Europe and North East Asia have been published,<br />
while those <strong>of</strong> New Zealand and the neotropics are in<br />
manuscript and will be published shortly. The generic keys<br />
in these books will this autumn be available on the Internet<br />
for free downloading. In 1987 360 poroid species were<br />
registered in Europe, and since then, i.e. over 15 years,<br />
about 5 species have been added, some <strong>of</strong> them probably<br />
tropical imports. 12 species have been described as new,<br />
almost all <strong>of</strong> them based on splitting <strong>of</strong> previously to<br />
widely accepted species, such as Antrodiella semisupina.<br />
This indicates clearly that the alpha phase is finished in<br />
Europe. The situation is similar in North America and<br />
North East Asia. In tropical Africa 320 species are<br />
registered excluding critical genera like Ganoderma and<br />
Phellinus while at least about 20 species are ready to be