06.04.2013 Views

Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association

Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association

Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IMC7 Friday August 16th Lectures<br />

Bark beetles present an economically and ecologically<br />

significant model for the study <strong>of</strong> multilevel symbiotic<br />

interactions. The southern pine beetle - Dendroctonus<br />

frontalis - is associated with both mutualistic and<br />

antagonistic fungi. The bluestain fungus - Ophiostoma<br />

minus - may initially assist the beetle in killing its tree host.<br />

However, as beetle larvae begin developing, it competes<br />

with the beetle for host tissue. The beetle also carries two<br />

fungi in specialized mycangia. These fungi<br />

(Ceratocystiopsis ranaculosus and Entomocorticium sp. A)<br />

are nutritional mutualists <strong>of</strong> the beetle. These mycangial<br />

fungi are able to grow and fructify within the host tree,<br />

providing nitrogen rich tissue for the beetles to feed upon -<br />

unless they are interfered with and outcompeted by O.<br />

minus. All three fungi interact in both positive and negative<br />

fashion with phoretic mites, which are carried into the tree<br />

by the beetle. These mites in turn vector and feed upon two<br />

<strong>of</strong> the beetle associated fungi (O. minus and C.<br />

ranaculosus). Though O. minus usually outcompetes the<br />

mycangial fungi, abiotic factors (such as water potential)<br />

may alter these interactions. In addition, the fungi are not<br />

<strong>of</strong> equal benefit to the beetle, or the mites. We review<br />

recent research into the biology and ecology <strong>of</strong> this<br />

complex system, pose hypotheses as to the effects <strong>of</strong> these<br />

interactions on the population dynamics <strong>of</strong> this destructive<br />

beetle, and consider the implications to the field <strong>of</strong> fungal<br />

symbioses.<br />

427 - Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> southern pine beetle-fungal<br />

interactions<br />

R.W. H<strong>of</strong>stetter 1* , K.D. Klepzig 2 , J.C. Moser 2 & M.P.<br />

Ayres 1<br />

1 Dartmouth College, 202 Gilman Hall, Hanover NH<br />

03755, U.S.A. - 2 USDA Forest Service, 2500 Shreveport<br />

Hwy, Pineville LA 71360, U.S.A. - E-mail:<br />

rwh@dartmouth.edu<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> microbes on the dynamics <strong>of</strong> animal<br />

populations may be due to direct interaction between<br />

associates and hosts, or may be indirectly mediated by<br />

other organisms within the community. We studied a<br />

fungus (Ophiostoma minus) that is, at various times and<br />

stages, an antagonist and competitor <strong>of</strong> the southern pine<br />

beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis), a mutualist <strong>of</strong> several<br />

mites associated with the beetle, and a facultative pathogen<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pines that play host to this beetle. We hypothesized<br />

that the population dynamics <strong>of</strong> D. frontalis are influenced<br />

by negative feedback through community interactions<br />

involving other (mutualistic mycangial) fungi and O.<br />

minus, and mites that transport and feed upon the<br />

associated fungi. We found O. minus abundance within<br />

bark to be positively related to mite abundance but<br />

negatively related to D. frontalis survival. The abundance<br />

<strong>of</strong> O. minus gradually increased as D. frontalis infestations<br />

progressed through time. Changes in O. minus abundance<br />

were more correlated with mite abundance than with the<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> O. minus on attacking beetles. Factors that<br />

affect the population dynamics and behavior <strong>of</strong> these mites,<br />

and the growth <strong>of</strong> O. minus in pines, likely play an<br />

important role in the population dynamics <strong>of</strong> the southern<br />

pine beetle.<br />

132<br />

<strong>Book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

428 - The consequences <strong>of</strong> oligophily in bark beetlefungus<br />

associations<br />

D.L. Six<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Forestry, University <strong>of</strong> Montana, Missoula, MT,<br />

U.S.A. - E-mail: six@forestry.umt.edu<br />

Fungi are ubiquitous associates <strong>of</strong> bark beetles (Coleoptera:<br />

Scolytidae). Investigations have revealed a diverse array <strong>of</strong><br />

association types ranging from mutualism to antagonism.<br />

Monophilic (one symbiont) and polyphilic (many<br />

symbionts) associations appear to be rare, while<br />

oligiophilic (two or a few symbionts) associations are<br />

common. Oligophily is likely to have several important<br />

consequences for both the host beetle and the symbiotic<br />

fungi. For any given association, fungal associates vary<br />

greatly in their effects on host beetle fitness, and therefore,<br />

are likely to differ in their influence on host population<br />

dynamics. Additionally, interactions, including competition<br />

for hosts, among multiple fungal associates <strong>of</strong> a beetle<br />

species may determine the relative abundance <strong>of</strong> each in a<br />

population, which, in turn, may also influence host<br />

population dynamics. Oligophily may be a less desirable<br />

state than monophily in associations that involve at least<br />

one mutualistic fungus. In such associations, for at least<br />

some beetles in a population, the mutualist can be<br />

displaced by less beneficial associates or by detrimental<br />

fungi, resulting in lower overall fitness. Some associates<br />

may actually be cheaters in the system,conferring few to no<br />

benefits to the host. While cheaters are potentially<br />

detrimental, beetles may be unable to develop effective<br />

means <strong>of</strong> avoiding cheaters without also negatively<br />

impacting beneficial associates.<br />

429 - Relationships among hosts, horntails, and fungi in<br />

Japan<br />

M. Tabata<br />

Shikoku Research Center, Forestry & Forest Products<br />

Research Institute, 2-915 Asakura-nishi, Kochi 780-8077,<br />

Japan. - E-mail: butter@ffpri.affrc.go.jp<br />

Wood discoloration <strong>of</strong> Chamaecyparis obtusa (hinoki) and<br />

Cryptomeria japonica (sugi) trees by the fungus associated<br />

with horntails, Urocerus japonicus and U. antennatus was<br />

studied in Japan. Wood discoloration in hinoki and sugi<br />

caused by the horntails and the fungus was found in several<br />

prefectures. The emergence periods <strong>of</strong> U. japonicus and U.<br />

antennatus were from the beginning <strong>of</strong> July to the middle<br />

<strong>of</strong> October and from the middle <strong>of</strong> May to the middle <strong>of</strong><br />

August, respectively. Cultures isolated from the mycangia<br />

<strong>of</strong> adult females <strong>of</strong> horntails showed the same cultural<br />

characteristics. Basidiocarps found on felled logs <strong>of</strong> hinoki<br />

and sugi were identified as Amylostereum laevigatum based<br />

on morphological characteristics. The cultures from the<br />

basidiocarps had the same cultural characteristics as those<br />

from the mycangia <strong>of</strong> horntails. Two mycangial isolates<br />

produced on basidiocarps on the stem segments <strong>of</strong> sugi by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!