Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association
Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association
Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IMC7 Friday August 16th Lectures<br />
Bark beetles present an economically and ecologically<br />
significant model for the study <strong>of</strong> multilevel symbiotic<br />
interactions. The southern pine beetle - Dendroctonus<br />
frontalis - is associated with both mutualistic and<br />
antagonistic fungi. The bluestain fungus - Ophiostoma<br />
minus - may initially assist the beetle in killing its tree host.<br />
However, as beetle larvae begin developing, it competes<br />
with the beetle for host tissue. The beetle also carries two<br />
fungi in specialized mycangia. These fungi<br />
(Ceratocystiopsis ranaculosus and Entomocorticium sp. A)<br />
are nutritional mutualists <strong>of</strong> the beetle. These mycangial<br />
fungi are able to grow and fructify within the host tree,<br />
providing nitrogen rich tissue for the beetles to feed upon -<br />
unless they are interfered with and outcompeted by O.<br />
minus. All three fungi interact in both positive and negative<br />
fashion with phoretic mites, which are carried into the tree<br />
by the beetle. These mites in turn vector and feed upon two<br />
<strong>of</strong> the beetle associated fungi (O. minus and C.<br />
ranaculosus). Though O. minus usually outcompetes the<br />
mycangial fungi, abiotic factors (such as water potential)<br />
may alter these interactions. In addition, the fungi are not<br />
<strong>of</strong> equal benefit to the beetle, or the mites. We review<br />
recent research into the biology and ecology <strong>of</strong> this<br />
complex system, pose hypotheses as to the effects <strong>of</strong> these<br />
interactions on the population dynamics <strong>of</strong> this destructive<br />
beetle, and consider the implications to the field <strong>of</strong> fungal<br />
symbioses.<br />
427 - Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> southern pine beetle-fungal<br />
interactions<br />
R.W. H<strong>of</strong>stetter 1* , K.D. Klepzig 2 , J.C. Moser 2 & M.P.<br />
Ayres 1<br />
1 Dartmouth College, 202 Gilman Hall, Hanover NH<br />
03755, U.S.A. - 2 USDA Forest Service, 2500 Shreveport<br />
Hwy, Pineville LA 71360, U.S.A. - E-mail:<br />
rwh@dartmouth.edu<br />
The effects <strong>of</strong> microbes on the dynamics <strong>of</strong> animal<br />
populations may be due to direct interaction between<br />
associates and hosts, or may be indirectly mediated by<br />
other organisms within the community. We studied a<br />
fungus (Ophiostoma minus) that is, at various times and<br />
stages, an antagonist and competitor <strong>of</strong> the southern pine<br />
beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis), a mutualist <strong>of</strong> several<br />
mites associated with the beetle, and a facultative pathogen<br />
<strong>of</strong> the pines that play host to this beetle. We hypothesized<br />
that the population dynamics <strong>of</strong> D. frontalis are influenced<br />
by negative feedback through community interactions<br />
involving other (mutualistic mycangial) fungi and O.<br />
minus, and mites that transport and feed upon the<br />
associated fungi. We found O. minus abundance within<br />
bark to be positively related to mite abundance but<br />
negatively related to D. frontalis survival. The abundance<br />
<strong>of</strong> O. minus gradually increased as D. frontalis infestations<br />
progressed through time. Changes in O. minus abundance<br />
were more correlated with mite abundance than with the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> O. minus on attacking beetles. Factors that<br />
affect the population dynamics and behavior <strong>of</strong> these mites,<br />
and the growth <strong>of</strong> O. minus in pines, likely play an<br />
important role in the population dynamics <strong>of</strong> the southern<br />
pine beetle.<br />
132<br />
<strong>Book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />
428 - The consequences <strong>of</strong> oligophily in bark beetlefungus<br />
associations<br />
D.L. Six<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Forestry, University <strong>of</strong> Montana, Missoula, MT,<br />
U.S.A. - E-mail: six@forestry.umt.edu<br />
Fungi are ubiquitous associates <strong>of</strong> bark beetles (Coleoptera:<br />
Scolytidae). Investigations have revealed a diverse array <strong>of</strong><br />
association types ranging from mutualism to antagonism.<br />
Monophilic (one symbiont) and polyphilic (many<br />
symbionts) associations appear to be rare, while<br />
oligiophilic (two or a few symbionts) associations are<br />
common. Oligophily is likely to have several important<br />
consequences for both the host beetle and the symbiotic<br />
fungi. For any given association, fungal associates vary<br />
greatly in their effects on host beetle fitness, and therefore,<br />
are likely to differ in their influence on host population<br />
dynamics. Additionally, interactions, including competition<br />
for hosts, among multiple fungal associates <strong>of</strong> a beetle<br />
species may determine the relative abundance <strong>of</strong> each in a<br />
population, which, in turn, may also influence host<br />
population dynamics. Oligophily may be a less desirable<br />
state than monophily in associations that involve at least<br />
one mutualistic fungus. In such associations, for at least<br />
some beetles in a population, the mutualist can be<br />
displaced by less beneficial associates or by detrimental<br />
fungi, resulting in lower overall fitness. Some associates<br />
may actually be cheaters in the system,conferring few to no<br />
benefits to the host. While cheaters are potentially<br />
detrimental, beetles may be unable to develop effective<br />
means <strong>of</strong> avoiding cheaters without also negatively<br />
impacting beneficial associates.<br />
429 - Relationships among hosts, horntails, and fungi in<br />
Japan<br />
M. Tabata<br />
Shikoku Research Center, Forestry & Forest Products<br />
Research Institute, 2-915 Asakura-nishi, Kochi 780-8077,<br />
Japan. - E-mail: butter@ffpri.affrc.go.jp<br />
Wood discoloration <strong>of</strong> Chamaecyparis obtusa (hinoki) and<br />
Cryptomeria japonica (sugi) trees by the fungus associated<br />
with horntails, Urocerus japonicus and U. antennatus was<br />
studied in Japan. Wood discoloration in hinoki and sugi<br />
caused by the horntails and the fungus was found in several<br />
prefectures. The emergence periods <strong>of</strong> U. japonicus and U.<br />
antennatus were from the beginning <strong>of</strong> July to the middle<br />
<strong>of</strong> October and from the middle <strong>of</strong> May to the middle <strong>of</strong><br />
August, respectively. Cultures isolated from the mycangia<br />
<strong>of</strong> adult females <strong>of</strong> horntails showed the same cultural<br />
characteristics. Basidiocarps found on felled logs <strong>of</strong> hinoki<br />
and sugi were identified as Amylostereum laevigatum based<br />
on morphological characteristics. The cultures from the<br />
basidiocarps had the same cultural characteristics as those<br />
from the mycangia <strong>of</strong> horntails. Two mycangial isolates<br />
produced on basidiocarps on the stem segments <strong>of</strong> sugi by