06.04.2013 Views

Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association

Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association

Book of Abstracts (PDF) - International Mycological Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IMC7 Main Congress Theme II: SYSTEMATICS, PHYLOGENY AND EVOLUTION Posters<br />

The monospecific genus Hydnodon was described by<br />

Banker (1913), based on Hydnum thelephorum (Léveillé,<br />

1844) because <strong>of</strong> the salmon-pinkish spore print and shape<br />

and ornamentation <strong>of</strong> the spores. This genus has been<br />

placed in different families <strong>of</strong> Aphyllophoralles such as<br />

Hydnaceae (Banker, 1913; Miller, 1933; Harrison, 1973),<br />

Thelephoraceae (Donk, 1964), and Hydnodontaceae<br />

(Jülich, 1981) using different morphological characters.<br />

Hydnodon has also been related with Scytinopogon because<br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> cyanophilic spores in both genera (Maas<br />

Geesteranus, 1963; Jülich, 1981). This research attempts to<br />

evaluate the phylogenetic affinities <strong>of</strong> Hydnodon based on<br />

recent phylogenetic hypothesis for the<br />

Homobasidiomycetes (Hibbett, 1997, Hibbett & Thorn,<br />

2001). DNA sequences <strong>of</strong> the nuc-SSU and mt-SSU <strong>of</strong> H.<br />

thelephorus were added to a data matrix which included<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> each major clade <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Homobasidiomycetes. The results corroborated a<br />

relationship between Hydnodon and Scytinopogon,<br />

supported by high bootstrap and decay values. This<br />

hypothesis agree with Maas Geestaranus (1963) and Jülich<br />

(1981) proposals, and is congruent with the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

inflated and gloeoplerous-like hyphae and a strong<br />

cyanophilic reaction <strong>of</strong> the spore ornamentation in both<br />

genera. Also, the position <strong>of</strong> Hydnodon and Scytinopogon<br />

in the general phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the Homobasidiomycetes<br />

suggests the presence <strong>of</strong> an additional clade, however, it is<br />

necessary to include more evidence to clarify this problem.<br />

749 - Molecular systematics <strong>of</strong> Ascochyta spp. infecting<br />

legumes<br />

T.L. Peever * , M. Barve & W.J. Kaiser<br />

Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6430,<br />

U.S.A. - E-mail: tpeever@wsu.edu<br />

Host-specific forms <strong>of</strong> Ascochyta spp. were sampled from<br />

chickpea (Cicer arietinum), faba bean (Vicia faba), lentil<br />

(Lens culinaris), pea (Pisum sativum) and hairy vetch<br />

(Vicia villosa) from various parts <strong>of</strong> the world and used to<br />

estimate a phylogeny. Previous results from laboratory<br />

crosses indicated that the Ascochyta spp. infecting faba<br />

bean, lentil and chickpea should be considered distinct<br />

biological species. We tested the hypothesis that these<br />

biological species were also phylogenetic species and<br />

extended the phylogeny to include isolates sampled from<br />

other legumes. We sequenced the nuclear ribosomal<br />

internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and a glyceraldehyde-3phosphate<br />

dehydrogenase gene (G3PD) and estimated a<br />

phylogeny for each dataset. Phylogenies estimated from the<br />

two genomic regions were highly congruent with G3PD<br />

revealing significantly more variation. The G3PD<br />

phylogeny revealed 4 clades, each with high bootstrap<br />

support. Clade 1 contained isolates <strong>of</strong> A. rabiei from<br />

chickpeas, Clade 2 isolates <strong>of</strong> Phoma medicaginis and<br />

Mycosphaerella pinodes from pea, Clade 3 isolates <strong>of</strong> A.<br />

pisi from pea and A. fabae from faba bean, and Clade 4<br />

isolates <strong>of</strong> A. lentis from lentil and Ascochyta sp. from V.<br />

villosa. These data provide strong support for A. rabiei, A.<br />

fabae and A. lentis as phylogenetic and biological species.<br />

The analysis also revealed that A. lentis is most closely<br />

226<br />

<strong>Book</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Abstracts</strong><br />

related the host specific form on V. villosa and that A.<br />

fabae is most closely related to A. pisi on pea.<br />

750 - The phylogenetic history <strong>of</strong> Cyttaria, an obligate<br />

parasite <strong>of</strong> Noth<strong>of</strong>agus<br />

K.R. Peterson * & D.H. Pfister<br />

Harvard University, 22 Divinity Ave., Cambridge, MA<br />

02138, U.S.A. - E-mail: kpeterson@oeb.harvard.edu<br />

The eleven species <strong>of</strong> the fungal genus Cyttaria<br />

(Cyttariales, Ascomycota) are obligately parasitic on<br />

several species <strong>of</strong> the Gondwanan angiosperm Noth<strong>of</strong>agus<br />

(Noth<strong>of</strong>agaceae, Hamamelididae). Seven Cyttaria species<br />

are endemic to southern South America (Chile and<br />

Argentina), while the other four are endemic to Australasia<br />

(Australia, Tasmania, and New Zealand). The goals <strong>of</strong> our<br />

present investigation are to: 1) identify the closest relatives<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cyttaria; 2) infer the phylogenetic relationships between<br />

Cyttaria species; and 3) infer the phylogenetic relationships<br />

within Cyttaria species. Thus, we have begun to construct<br />

molecular sequence data sets from the following markers:<br />

nuclear ribosomal SSU, LSU, and ITS DNA; mitochondrial<br />

ribosomal SSU and LSU DNA; and the nuclear protein<br />

coding gene RPB2. Preliminary results suggest a close<br />

relationship between Cyttaria and the Helotiales. They also<br />

suggest two major lineages <strong>of</strong> Cyttaria: one composed<br />

entirely <strong>of</strong> South American species and another composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> South American and Australasian species. There also<br />

seems to be significant intraspecific variation within certain<br />

<strong>of</strong> the more widespread species. Ultimately, we will have a<br />

robust means with which to test the widely accepted<br />

hypothesis that the species <strong>of</strong> Cyttaria and Noth<strong>of</strong>agus<br />

have cospeciated. We will also be able to examine the<br />

extent to which vicariance versus dispersal can be invoked<br />

to explain the modern distributions <strong>of</strong> Cyttaria species and<br />

their hosts.<br />

751 - Diaporthe foeniculacea and its Phomopsis<br />

anamorph in Portugal<br />

A.J.L. Phillips<br />

CREM, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade<br />

Nova de Lisboa, Quinta da Torre, 2829-516 Caparica,<br />

Portugal. - E-mail: alp@mail.fct.unl.pt<br />

Niessl described Diaporthe foeniculacea on Foeniculum<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficinale from a collection by Moller at Coimbra,<br />

Portugal. Wehmeyer considered it to be a species <strong>of</strong><br />

Diaporthopsis and transferred it to Diaporthopsis<br />

angelicae. He did not mention the anamorph. Saccardo<br />

described Phoma foeniculina on F. <strong>of</strong>ficinale. Camara<br />

transferred the name to Phomopsis foeniculina based on a<br />

collection from Sacavém, Portugal. Neither Saccardo nor<br />

Camara mentioned the teleomorph. In August 2001, a<br />

fungus with the general characteristics <strong>of</strong> a Diaporthe sp.<br />

was found on a plant <strong>of</strong> F. vulgare on the island <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!