10.04.2013 Views

The life and work of St. Paul

The life and work of St. Paul

The life and work of St. Paul

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THB 8AMABITAN8 THE EUNUCH THE OENTUBION. 165<br />

had been surreptitiously put into a box <strong>and</strong> drawn up the walls <strong>of</strong> Jerusalem,<br />

the Jews declared that a shudder <strong>of</strong> earthquake had run through four hundred<br />

parasangs <strong>of</strong> the Holy L<strong>and</strong>.1 Yet this filthy <strong>and</strong> atrocious creature, which could<br />

hardly even be thought <strong>of</strong> without pollution, was not only the chief delicacy<br />

at Gentile banquets, 2 but was, in one form or other, one <strong>of</strong> the commonest<br />

articles <strong>of</strong> Gentile consumption. How could a Jew touch or speak to a human<br />

being who <strong>of</strong> deliberate choice had banqueted on swine's flesh, <strong>and</strong> who might<br />

on that very day have partaken <strong>of</strong> tho abomination P <strong>The</strong> cleansing <strong>of</strong> all<br />

articles <strong>of</strong> food involved far more immediately than has yet been noticed the<br />

acceptance <strong>of</strong> Gentiles on equal footing to equal privileges.<br />

And doubtless, as such thoughts passed through the soul <strong>of</strong> Peter, he<br />

remembered also that remarkable " parable " <strong>of</strong> Jesus <strong>of</strong> which he <strong>and</strong> his<br />

brother disciples had once asked the explanation. Jesus in a few words, but<br />

with both <strong>of</strong> the emphatic formulae which Ho adopted to call special attention<br />

to any utterance <strong>of</strong> more than<br />

"<br />

ordinary depth <strong>and</strong> solemnity Hearken unto<br />

me, every one <strong>of</strong> you, <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> '' "<br />

; If any man haih ears to liear, le,i<br />

him hear," 3 had said, " <strong>The</strong>re is nothing from without a man entering into<br />

him which can defile him." What He had proceeded to say that what<br />

truly denies a man is that which comes out <strong>of</strong> him was easy enough to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> was a truth <strong>of</strong> deep meaning; but so difficult had it been<br />

to grasp the first half <strong>of</strong> the clause, that they had asked Him to explain a<br />

" parable " which seemed to be in direct contradiction to the Mosaic Law.<br />

Expressing His astonishment at their want <strong>of</strong> insight, He had shown them<br />

that what entered into a man from without did but become a part <strong>of</strong> his<br />

material organism, entering, " not into the heart, but into the belly, <strong>and</strong> so<br />

passing into the draught." THIS, HE SAID as now for the first time,<br />

perhaps, flashed with full conviction into the mind <strong>of</strong> Peter MAKING- ALL<br />

* MEATS PURE as ho ;<br />

proceeded afterwards to develop those weighty truths<br />

about the inward character <strong>of</strong> all real pollution, <strong>and</strong> the genesis <strong>of</strong> all crime<br />

from evil thoughts, which convey so solemn a warning. To me it seems that<br />

it was the trance <strong>and</strong> vision <strong>of</strong> Joppa which first made Peter realise the true<br />

meaning <strong>of</strong> Christ in one <strong>of</strong> those few distinct utterances in which he had<br />

intimated the coming annulment o the Mosaic Law. It is, doubtless, due to<br />

the fact that <strong>St</strong>. Peter, as_the informant <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Mark in writing his Gospel,<br />

1 Jer. EeracMth, iv. 1 ; Derenbourg, Palest. 114 ; Gratz. iii. 480. (<strong>The</strong> story IB also<br />

told in Babha Kama, f. 82, 2 ; Mcnachoth, f. 64, 2 ; Sotah, f. 49, 2.)<br />

*<br />

Sumen, in Plaut. Cure. ii. 3, 44 ; Pers. i. 53 ; Plin. H. N. xi. 37.-<br />

Mark vii. 14, 16.<br />

* Mark vii. 19. This interpretation, due originally to the early Fathers being found<br />

in Chrysostom, Horn, in Matt. li. p. 526, <strong>and</strong> Gregory Thaumaturgus was revived, forty<br />

years ago, by the Rev. F. Field, in a note <strong>of</strong> his edition <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Chrysostom's Homilies<br />

(iii. 112). (See Expositor for 1876, where I have examined the passage at length.) Here,<br />

however, it lay unnoticed, till it gained, quite recently, the attention which it deserved.<br />

<strong>The</strong> true reading is certainly Ka.0api&v not the KaBapifrv <strong>of</strong> our edition a reading due, in<br />

all probability, to the impossibility <strong>of</strong> making KaiBaplfrv agree with a^ejpira. <strong>The</strong> loss <strong>of</strong><br />

the true interpretation has been very serious. Now, however, it is happily revived. It<br />

has a more direct bearing than any other on the main practical difficulty <strong>of</strong> the Apostolic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!