10.04.2013 Views

The life and work of St. Paul

The life and work of St. Paul

The life and work of St. Paul

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4#4 1EU LIFE AND WORK OF ST. PAtTt.<br />

leading anthropomorphism) as regards God, but from the finite <strong>and</strong> imperfect<br />

<strong>and</strong> therefore the Apostle adds that Christ becomes such<br />

st<strong>and</strong>point <strong>of</strong> man ;<br />

to us by means <strong>of</strong> faith in His blood.<br />

6. <strong>The</strong> reason for this, the manifestation <strong>of</strong> God's righteousness, which<br />

might otherwise have been called in question, because <strong>of</strong> the pretermission <strong>of</strong><br />

past sins.<br />

7. <strong>The</strong> end to be attained, that, in perfect consistency with justice, God<br />

might justify all whose new <strong>life</strong> had its root in faith.<br />

Boasting then is impossible, since merit is non-existent. By worJcs it is<br />

unattainable ; by the very conception <strong>of</strong> faith it is excluded. Tliis holds true<br />

alike for Jew <strong>and</strong> Pagan, <strong>and</strong> Justification is God's free gift to man as man, 1<br />

because He is One, <strong>and</strong> the God alike <strong>of</strong> Jews <strong>and</strong> Gentiles. To the Jew<br />

faith is the source, to the Gentile the instrument <strong>of</strong> this justification. 8<br />

But here another objection has to be combated. <strong>The</strong> Jew might say, " By this<br />

faith <strong>of</strong> yours you are nullifying the Law" meaning by the Law the whole Mosaic<br />

dispensation, <strong>and</strong> generally the Old Testament as containing the history <strong>of</strong> the<br />

covenant people. On the contrary, <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Paul</strong> replies, I am establishing it on a firmer<br />

basis; 8 for I am exhibiting it in its true position, manifesting it in its true relations ;<br />

showing it to be the divinely-necessary part <strong>of</strong> a greater system ; adding to the<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> its spirituality, rendering possible the cheerful obedience to its requirements<br />

; indicating its divine fulfilment. I am showing that the consciousness <strong>of</strong><br />

sin which came by the Law is the indispensable preparation for the reception <strong>of</strong><br />

grace. Let us begin at tbe very beginning. Let us go 'back from Moses even to<br />

Abraham. What did he, our father, gain by <strong>work</strong>s? 4 By his <strong>work</strong>s he gained<br />

nothing before God, as <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Paul</strong> proves by tbe verse that " He believed God, <strong>and</strong> it<br />

was imputed to him for righteousness."" That word "imputed" repeated eleven<br />

the sphere <strong>of</strong> Law. <strong>The</strong> inward motive the element in which God's essential nature is<br />

revealed, is the grace <strong>of</strong> God (Horn. iii. 24).<br />

1 Ver. 28, <strong>The</strong>refore [but yap, , A] we reckon that a man is justified by faith<br />

without the <strong>work</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the Law." This is the verse in which Luther interpolated the word<br />

"<br />

"alone" "Vox SOLA tot clamoribus lapidata (Erasm.). Hence the name Solifidian.<br />

It was a legitimate inference, <strong>and</strong> was already existing in the Nuremberg Bible (1483)<br />

contradiction <strong>of</strong> oinc IK n-iorew?<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Genoese (1476), but was an unfortunate apparent<br />

iiovov (James ii. 24). But Luther's famous preface shows sufficiently that he recognised<br />

the necessity <strong>of</strong> <strong>work</strong>s in the same sense as <strong>St</strong>. James (see Art. xi., xii.). Luther was<br />

not guilty or the foolish error which identifies faith with mere belief ; <strong>and</strong> yet, perhaps,<br />

bis mode <strong>of</strong> dealing with this verse led to his rash remark as to the impossibility <strong>of</strong><br />

reconciling the two Apostles (Colloqu. ii. 203).<br />

2<br />

iii. 27 c 30, irepiTOfHjv TTiorccot . . . ojrpojSvcrrtav Sia. rljs iria-reiat Seems to imply<br />

some real difference in the Apostle's view, though Meyer (usually such a purist) here<br />

denies it. Calvin sees a shade<br />

"<br />

<strong>of</strong> in it This is the<br />

irony gr<strong>and</strong> difference : the Jew is<br />

saved ex fide, the Gentile per fidem 1 Bengel is probably right when he says that it<br />

implies the priority <strong>of</strong> the Jews, <strong>and</strong> the acceptance <strong>of</strong> the Gospel from them by the<br />

Gentiles the Jews as an ;<br />

outgrowth <strong>of</strong> faith, the Gentiles by the means <strong>of</strong> the faith,<br />

(see Gal. iii. 2226).<br />

8<br />

iii. 31. See chap. vi. ; viii. 4 ; xiii. 10.<br />

4<br />

iv. 1. If we do not Omit vpr]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!