10.04.2013 Views

The life and work of St. Paul

The life and work of St. Paul

The life and work of St. Paul

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

220 THE LIFE ANI> WORK OF ST, PAUL.<br />

So ended the first mission journey <strong>of</strong> the Apostle <strong>Paul</strong> the first flight as<br />

it were <strong>of</strong> the eagle, which was soon to soar with yet bolder wing, in yet wider<br />

circles, among yet more raging storms. We have followed him by the brief<br />

notices <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Luke, but we have no means <strong>of</strong> deciding either the exact date<br />

<strong>of</strong> the journey, or its exact duration. It is only when the crises in the history<br />

<strong>of</strong> the early Church synchronise with events <strong>of</strong> secular history, that we can<br />

ever with certainty ascertain the date to which they should be assigned. 1<br />

We have seen that <strong>Paul</strong> <strong>and</strong> Barnabas visited Jerusalem about the time <strong>of</strong><br />

Herod Agrippa's death, <strong>and</strong> this took place in April A.D. 44. After this<br />

they returned to Antioch, <strong>and</strong> the next thing wo are told about them is theii*<br />

obedience to the spiritual intimation which marked them out as Evangelists to<br />

the heathen. It is reasonable to believe, therefore, that they spent about a<br />

year at Antioch, since they could not easily find vessels to convoy them from<br />

place to place except in tho months during which the sea was regarded as<br />

open. Now navigation with the ancients began with the rising <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Pleiades, that is, in the mouth <strong>of</strong> March; <strong>and</strong> we may assume with fair<br />

probability that March, A.D. 45, is the date at which they began their<br />

evangelising labours. Beyond this all must be conjecture. <strong>The</strong>y do not seem<br />

2<br />

at Antioch in Pisidia<br />

to have spent more than a mouth or two in Cyprus ;<br />

their stay was certainly brief. At Iconium they remained "a considerable<br />

"<br />

but at Lystra again, <strong>and</strong> at Derbe, <strong>and</strong> on their return tour, <strong>and</strong> at<br />

tmie ;<br />

Perga <strong>and</strong> Attaleia, the narrative implies no long residence. Taking into<br />

account the time consumed in travelling, we are hardly at liberty to suppose<br />

that the first circuit occupied much more than a year, <strong>and</strong> they may have<br />

returned to the Syrian Antioch in the late spring <strong>of</strong> A.D. 46. 3<br />

1 See Chronological Excursus, infra, p. 753.<br />

* Acts xiv. 3, Ixavov xpw- This ma7 mean anything, from a month or two, up to a<br />

year or more. It is a phrase <strong>of</strong> frequent occurrence in <strong>St</strong>. Luke (see Acts viii. 11 ; xxvii.<br />

9 ; Luke viii. 27 ; xx. 9).<br />

3 That Antioch in Pisidia, Iconium, Derbe, <strong>and</strong> Lystra were not the churches <strong>of</strong><br />

Galatia, as has been suggested by Boitger (Eeiti-agc, i. 28, sq.), Renan, Hausrath, <strong>and</strong><br />

others, is surely demonstrable. Galatia had two meanings the first ethnographical, the<br />

second political. <strong>The</strong> ethnographic use was the popular <strong>and</strong> the all but universal one.<br />

It meant that small central district <strong>of</strong> Asia Minor, about 200 miles in length, which was<br />

occupied by the three Gallic tribes the Trocmi, the Tolistobogii, the Tectosages with<br />

the three capitals, Tavium, Pessinus, <strong>and</strong> Ancyra. Politically it meant a "department,"<br />

an "administrative group," a mere agglomeration <strong>of</strong> districts thrown into loose cohesion<br />

by political accidents. In this political meaning the Roman province <strong>of</strong> Galatia was<br />

based on the kingdom <strong>of</strong> Amyntas (Dion Cass. liii. 26), a wealthy grazier <strong>and</strong> freebooter,<br />

who had received from Mark Antony the kingdom <strong>of</strong> Pisidia, <strong>and</strong> by subsequent additions<br />

had become possessed <strong>of</strong> Galatia Proper, Lycaonia, parts <strong>of</strong> Pamphytta, <strong>and</strong> Cilicia<br />

Aspera. On his death various changes occurred, but when <strong>Paul</strong> <strong>and</strong> Barnabas were on<br />

their first journey Pamphylia was under a propraetor ; Iconium was a separate tetrarchy ;<br />

Lystra <strong>and</strong> Derbe belonged to Antiochus IV. <strong>of</strong> Commageno. Galatia, Pisidia north <strong>of</strong><br />

the Paroreia, <strong>and</strong> the greater part <strong>of</strong> Lycaonia formed the Roman province <strong>of</strong> Galatia.<br />

But even if we grant that <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Paul</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Luke might have used the word Galatia in<br />

its artificial sense, even then Antioch in Pisidia appears to be the only town mentioned<br />

in this circuit which is actually in the Roman province. This alone seems sufficient to<br />

disprove the hypothesis that in the first journey we have a narrative <strong>of</strong> the founding <strong>of</strong><br />

the Galatian Church. Further, a far as <strong>St</strong>. Luke is concerned, it would be a confused<br />

method, unlike his careful accuracy, to use the words Pisidia, Lycaonia, Pamphylia, <strong>and</strong><br />

later in his narrative Mysia, <strong>and</strong> other districts in their geographical sense, <strong>and</strong> then

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!