10.04.2013 Views

The life and work of St. Paul

The life and work of St. Paul

The life and work of St. Paul

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS, AND THEOLOGY OF ST. PAUL. 477<br />

fedd as the second half <strong>of</strong> the parallel, " so, too, by one man came justification, <strong>and</strong><br />

so <strong>life</strong> was <strong>of</strong>fered to all." <strong>The</strong> conclusion <strong>of</strong> the sentence was, however, displaced<br />

by the desire to meet a difficulty. He had said, " all sinned," but some one might<br />

object, " How so ? you have already told us that where there is no law there is no<br />

transgression ; how, then, could men sin between Adam <strong>and</strong> Moses ?" <strong>The</strong> answer<br />

is far from clear to underst<strong>and</strong>. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Paul</strong> might perhaps have referred to the law<br />

<strong>of</strong> nature, the transgression <strong>of</strong> which involved sin ; but what he says is that " till<br />

the law, sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law." If he<br />

had said, " sin is not brought into prominent self-consciousness," his meaning<br />

would have been both clear <strong>and</strong> consistent, but the verb used (t\\oyeiTcu) does not<br />

admit <strong>of</strong> this sense. Perhaps we may take the word popularly to imply that " it is<br />

not so fully reckoned or imputed," a view which may find its illustration in our<br />

Lord's remark that the sin <strong>of</strong> Sodom <strong>and</strong> Gomorrah was less unpardonable than<br />

that <strong>of</strong> Chorazin <strong>and</strong> Bethsaida. It seems as if he meant to imply a distinction<br />

between " tin " in general, <strong>and</strong> the " transgression " <strong>of</strong> some special law or laws in<br />

paiticular. 1 "Every sin," as <strong>St</strong>. Thomas Aquinas says, "may be called a transgression<br />

in so far as it transgresses a natural law but it is a ;<br />

more serious thing to<br />

transgress a law both natural <strong>and</strong> written. And so, when the law was given, transgression<br />

increased <strong>and</strong> deserved greater anger." But the only pro<strong>of</strong> which <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Paul</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fers that there was sin during this period is that, throughout it, death also<br />

reigned. 2<br />

When, however, he passes from this somewhat obscure reply (13, 14),<br />

to show how Adam was a type <strong>of</strong> Christ, his meaning again becomes clear. He<br />

dwells first on the points <strong>of</strong> difference (15 18), <strong>and</strong> then on those <strong>of</strong> resemblanc<br />

(18, 19). <strong>The</strong> differences between the results'caused by Adam <strong>and</strong> Christ are differences<br />

both qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative both in degree <strong>and</strong> kind.<br />

i. By Adam's one transgression the many died, but the free grace <strong>of</strong> Christ<br />

abounded to the many in a far greater degree. 8<br />

rate, imitate <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Paul</strong> in dwelling rather on the positive than the negative side, rather on<br />

Christ than Adam, rather on the superabundance <strong>of</strong> grace than the origin <strong>of</strong> sin.<br />

1 "<br />

So most <strong>of</strong> the commentators. Sine lege palest csse quis iniquus sed nan praevaricator"<br />

(Augustine). Luther<br />

" "<br />

explains AAoyeIr

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!