10.04.2013 Views

The life and work of St. Paul

The life and work of St. Paul

The life and work of St. Paul

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS, AND THEOLOOT OF ST. PAUL. 4(57<br />

What it does is to warn us against seeking <strong>and</strong> following the lowest <strong>and</strong> most<br />

short-lived pleasures as a final end. This was the fatal error <strong>of</strong> the popular<br />

Hedonism. <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Paul</strong>'s sketch <strong>of</strong> its moral dissolution <strong>and</strong> the misery <strong>and</strong><br />

shame which it inevitably involved, is but another illustration <strong>of</strong> the truth that<br />

" Who follows pleasure, pleasure slays,<br />

God's wrath upon- himself he wreaks ;<br />

But all delights attend his days<br />

Who takes with thanks but never seeks."<br />

ii. Having thus accomplished his task <strong>of</strong> proving the guilt <strong>of</strong> the Gentiles,<br />

he turns to the Jews. But he does so with consummate tact. He does not<br />

at once startle them into antagonism, by shocking all their prejudices, but<br />

begins with the perfectly general statement, " <strong>The</strong>refore * thou art inexcusable,<br />

O man every one who judgest." <strong>The</strong> " therefore " impetuously anticipates<br />

the reason why he who judges others is, in this instance, inexcusable namely,<br />

because he does the same things himself. He does not at once say, as he<br />

might have done, "You who are Jews are as inexcusable as the Gentiles,<br />

because in judging them you are condemning yourselves, <strong>and</strong> though you<br />

habitually<br />

'<br />

call them sinners '<br />

you are no less sinners yourselves." 2 This is<br />

the conclusion at which he points, but he wishes the Jew to be led step by<br />

step into self-condemnation, less hollow than vague generalities. 3 He is <strong>of</strong><br />

course speaking alike <strong>of</strong> Jews <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pagans generically, <strong>and</strong> not implying<br />

that there were no exceptions. But he has to introduce the argument against<br />

the Jews carefully <strong>and</strong> gradually, because, blinded by their own privileges, they<br />

were apt to take a very different view <strong>of</strong> their own character. But they were<br />

less excusable because more enlightened. He therefore begins, " O man," <strong>and</strong><br />

not " O Jew," <strong>and</strong> asks the imaginary person to whom he is appealing whether<br />

he thinks that God will in his case make an individual exception to His own<br />

inflexible decrees? or whether he .intends to despise the riches <strong>of</strong> God's endur-<br />

ance, by ignoring 4 that its sole intention is to lead him to repentance <strong>and</strong> so<br />

to heap up against himself a horrible treasury <strong>of</strong> final ruin ? God's law is<br />

rigid, universal, absolute. It is that God will repay every man according to<br />

his <strong>work</strong>s. 6 This law is illustrated by a tw<strong>of</strong>old amplification, which, beginning<br />

<strong>and</strong> ending with the reward <strong>of</strong> goodness, <strong>and</strong> inserting twice over in the<br />

1 This Aifc <strong>of</strong> Ii. 1 is clearly proleptic.<br />

8 Gal. ii. 15, i^iets u

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!