10.04.2013 Views

The life and work of St. Paul

The life and work of St. Paul

The life and work of St. Paul

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE SCHOOL OF THE KABM. 81<br />

himself uses spermaia in 1 Cor. xv. 38 <strong>and</strong> that the Greek spervnaia, in the<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> " <strong>of</strong>fspring," would be nothing less than an impossible barbarism.<br />

<strong>The</strong> argument, therefore if it bo an argument at all, <strong>and</strong> not what tho<br />

Rabbis would have called a sod, or " mystery "<br />

does not, <strong>and</strong> cannot, turn,<br />

as has been so unhesitatingly assumed, on the fact that sperma is a singular<br />

noun, but on the fact that it 5s a collective noun, <strong>and</strong> was deliberately used<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> "sons" or "children;" 1 <strong>and</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Paul</strong> declares that this collective<br />

term was meant from the first to apply to Christ, as elsewhere he applies it<br />

spiritually to the servants <strong>of</strong> Christ. In the interpretation, then, <strong>of</strong> this word,<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Paul</strong> reads between the lines <strong>of</strong> the original, <strong>and</strong> is enabled to see in it<br />

deep meanings which are the true, but not the primary ones. He does not<br />

say at once that the promises to Abraham found in Christ as in the purpose<br />

<strong>of</strong> God it had always been intended that they should find in Christ 2<br />

their<br />

highest <strong>and</strong> truest fulfilment; but, in a manner belonging peculiarly to the<br />

Jewish style <strong>of</strong> exegesis, he illustrates this high truth by the use <strong>of</strong> a collective<br />

noun in which he believes it to have been mystically foreshadowed. 3<br />

This passage is admirably adapted to throw light on the Apostle's use <strong>of</strong><br />

the Old Testament. Rabbinic in form, it was free in spirit. Though he does<br />

not disdain either Amoraic or Alex<strong>and</strong>rian methods <strong>of</strong> dealing with Scripture,<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Paul</strong> never falls into the follios or extravagances <strong>of</strong> either. Treating the<br />

letter <strong>of</strong> Scripture with intense respect, he yet made the literal sense <strong>of</strong> it bend<br />

at will to the service <strong>of</strong> the spiritual consciousness. On the dead letter <strong>of</strong> tho<br />

Urim, which recorded the names <strong>of</strong> lost tribes, he flashed a mystic ray, which<br />

made them gleam forth into divine <strong>and</strong> hitherto undreamed-<strong>of</strong> oracles. <strong>The</strong><br />

actual words <strong>of</strong> the sacred writers became but as the wheels <strong>and</strong> wings <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Cherubim, <strong>and</strong> whithersoever the Spirit went they went. Nothing is more<br />

natural, nothing more interesting, in the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> an inspired teacher<br />

nothing is more valuable, than this mode <strong>of</strong> application. We have not<br />

in <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Paul</strong> the frigid spirit <strong>of</strong> Philonian allegory which to a great<br />

extent depreciated the original <strong>and</strong> historic sense <strong>of</strong> Scripttire, <strong>and</strong> was<br />

chiefly bent on educing philosophic mysteries from its living page ; nor have<br />

we a single instance <strong>of</strong> Gematria or Notarikon, <strong>of</strong> Atbash or Albam, <strong>of</strong><br />

Hillel's middoth or Akibha's method <strong>of</strong> hanging legal decisions on the horns<br />

<strong>of</strong> letters. Into these unreal mysticisms <strong>and</strong> exegetical frivolities it was<br />

impossible that a man should fall who was intensely earnest, <strong>and</strong> felt, in tho<br />

vast mass <strong>of</strong> what he wrote, that he had the Spirit <strong>of</strong> the Lord. In no<br />

single instance does he make one <strong>of</strong> these general quotations the demonstrative<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> the point which he is endeavouring to impress. In every instance<br />

1 See Lightfopt, ad loc., p. 139.<br />

- As in Gen. iii. 15. <strong>The</strong> Jews could not deny the force <strong>of</strong> the argument, for they<br />

interpreted Gen. iv. 25, &c., <strong>of</strong> the Messiah. But <strong>St</strong>. Jerome's remark, "Galatis, quoa<br />

paulo ante stultos dbcerat, factus est stultus," as though the Apostle had purposely used<br />

an " accommodation " argument, is founded on wrong principles.<br />

8 <strong>The</strong> purely illustrative character <strong>of</strong> the reference seems to be clear from the<br />

diif ereut, yet no less spiritualised, sense given to the text in Rom. ir. 13. 16, 18 j is. 8 ;<br />

Gal. jii. 28, 29.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!