02.06.2013 Views

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7<br />

MAYAK WORKERS<br />

7.1 Introduction<br />

The cohort <strong>of</strong> Mayak workers is distinctly different<br />

from other worker cohorts in that the average<br />

exposures <strong>of</strong> these workers were much higher and<br />

women made up a greater fraction <strong>of</strong> the workforce.<br />

For this reason we have devoted a separate section to<br />

this cohort. Mayak has also made a pr<strong>of</strong>ound impact<br />

on the communities along the Techa River; this is<br />

discussed in Section 12.<br />

Mayak (the Mayak Production Association), in<br />

the southern Urals region <strong>of</strong> Chelyabinsk, was the<br />

first nuclear complex in the Soviet Union. The plant<br />

included a nuclear reactor, a plutonium production<br />

facility, and a radiochemical fuel separation facility.<br />

<strong>Radiation</strong> exposures during the first few years <strong>of</strong><br />

operation were quite high, with average annual<br />

external doses <strong>of</strong> roughly 0.5 Gy. Exposures declined<br />

following a 20-fold reduction in the maximum daily<br />

permissible dose in 1952 (Koshurnikova et al. 1999),<br />

but were still relatively high- the mean lifetime<br />

dose received by Mayak workers averaged 0.8 Gy,<br />

roughly an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude higher than mean<br />

lifetime doses in most worker cohorts (see Section<br />

6). In addition to external radiation these workers<br />

were exposed to plutonium. Inhaled plutonium<br />

is deposited most heavily in the lungs, and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plutonium that migrates to the rest <strong>of</strong> the body about<br />

50% is deposited in the skeleton (Koshurnikova et<br />

al. 2000). Deposited plutonium remains in the body<br />

for a long time resulting in chronic exposure to alpha<br />

particles; the mean alpha lung dose in this cohort<br />

was 0.2 Gy. Exposure pr<strong>of</strong>iles varied by facility as<br />

shown in Table 1.<br />

7.2 <strong>Health</strong> effects<br />

Two approaches to this cohort have been pursued<br />

by different teams <strong>of</strong> scientists from Chelyabinsk<br />

and their colleagues- case-control studies <strong>of</strong> lung<br />

cancer (Tokarskaya et al. 1995, 1997, 2002) and<br />

cohort studies <strong>of</strong> total mortality and various causes<br />

<strong>of</strong> death. These studies have been reviewed by the<br />

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> Atomic <strong>Radiation</strong> (UNSCEAR 1994, 2000), by<br />

the Radiological Assessments Corporation for an<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> plutonium risks around Rocky Flats<br />

Plant (RAC 2000), and recently by Harrison and<br />

Muirhead for a comparison <strong>of</strong> risks from external<br />

and internal radiation (2003). A comprehensive<br />

cohort study <strong>of</strong> mortality in all 21,557 Mayak<br />

workers was presented in 2003 (Shilnikova et al.).<br />

The most apparent health effects in Mayak workers<br />

have been the cancers associated with plutonium-<br />

lung, liver, and bone cancer and leukemia.<br />

Lung cancer. Tokarskaya et al. (1995) found<br />

that lung cancer was associated with plutonium<br />

exposures, gamma exposures, and smoking. No<br />

dose-response analysis was performed for gamma<br />

exposures but the plutonium dose-response curve<br />

that they generated was nonlinear with a threshold<br />

at 0.8 Gy 1 . In 2002 Tokarskaya et al. used an<br />

1 Issues with this dose-response analysis were raised by Jan Beyea (1998); he noted that case-control studies are<br />

not able to distinguish between non-linear dose-response relationships and differences in exposure distributions<br />

between cases and controls.<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!