Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
104 Uranium Miners<br />
enrichment facilities. The exposures <strong>of</strong> millers have<br />
not been studied as intensively as the exposures<br />
<strong>of</strong> miners or radiation workers generally. Some <strong>of</strong><br />
the papers that we discuss in this section include<br />
the exposures <strong>of</strong> millers, and some <strong>of</strong> the papers in<br />
section 6 discuss exposure at uranium processing<br />
and enrichment facilities. The bulk <strong>of</strong> this section,<br />
however, is focused on the exposures <strong>of</strong> miners.<br />
The mine environment is dangerous is many<br />
ways, and lung cancer risk factors include silica,<br />
arsenic, chromium, and nickel. Exposure to radiation<br />
in mining typically occurs through inhalation <strong>of</strong><br />
air and dust containing radon (Rn-222); the term<br />
“radon” is usually used in reference to an air<br />
mixture <strong>of</strong> alpha-emitters including radon and its<br />
radioactive decay products, or daughters. Radon<br />
daughters can be retained in the lungs for long<br />
periods, so exposure continues long after the initial<br />
inhalation. It should be noted that although Rn-222<br />
is a decay product <strong>of</strong> uranium, exposure to radon<br />
is not at all limited to uranium mining--miners <strong>of</strong><br />
other ores and residents <strong>of</strong> many homes are exposed<br />
to the naturally occurring decay products <strong>of</strong> both<br />
uranium and thorium. The exposures <strong>of</strong> uranium<br />
miners are thus comparable to exposures in some<br />
other mines and to residential radon exposures,<br />
although residential exposures are usually lower in<br />
magnitude. Comparisons with residential exposures<br />
are discussed at the end <strong>of</strong> this section, but based<br />
on the availability <strong>of</strong> exposure information and the<br />
relatively high exposures, epidemiological data on<br />
miners provides some <strong>of</strong> the best information that<br />
we have about alpha radiation exposure, especially<br />
lung exposure due to inhalation.<br />
Studies <strong>of</strong> miners and other radon-exposed<br />
cohorts are hard to compare to the rest <strong>of</strong> the<br />
radiation epidemiology field because exposure is<br />
not measured in conventional units. Exposure to<br />
radiation in mines is measured in “working levels”<br />
which correspond to 200 pCi (picocuries) <strong>of</strong> radon<br />
daughters per liter <strong>of</strong> air. Exposure to the equivalent<br />
<strong>of</strong> one working level for one month <strong>of</strong> work is called<br />
one Working Level Month (WLM). The conversion<br />
<strong>of</strong> WLM to sieverts is not straightforward because it<br />
depends on breathing rate and the size <strong>of</strong> the radon<br />
daughter aerosols. UNSCEAR (2000) suggests that<br />
the average value is roughly 5.7 mSv per WLM 3 .<br />
Although there has been an awareness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
hazards <strong>of</strong> mining for over a centrury, it was not<br />
until 1959 that the US passed a radon safety standard<br />
for workers’ health at 1 WL (or 12 WLM per year).<br />
This standard was adjusted in 1971 to an annual<br />
allowable exposure <strong>of</strong> 4 WLM (Caufield 1989).<br />
Still, by 1971 many miners in the US and elsewhere<br />
had already been exposed to much greater amounts<br />
<strong>of</strong> radiation than standards allowed, and the earlier<br />
epidemiological reports easily showed correlations<br />
between exposure to radiation in uranium mining<br />
activities and adverse health effects.<br />
8.2 US studies<br />
Early US studies looked at large groups <strong>of</strong> uranium<br />
miners from various mines in the western part <strong>of</strong><br />
the country (see Figure 8-2). Wagoner et al. (1964)<br />
showed a significant excess <strong>of</strong> lung cancer mortality<br />
among uranium miners and millers (15 observed<br />
vs. 6.9 expected, p