Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
1.1 Goals<br />
The health risks <strong>of</strong> exposure to low levels <strong>of</strong><br />
ionizing radiation are disputed within the scientific<br />
community. <strong>Risks</strong> associated with exposure to high<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> radiation are widely accepted and well<br />
documented based primarily on the studies <strong>of</strong> the<br />
atomic bomb survivors in Nagasaki and Hiroshima.<br />
Some feel that the best way to estimate risk for lowlevel<br />
exposures is to extrapolate from higher doses,<br />
although there is some clear evidence <strong>of</strong> low-dose<br />
risk. In this overview we have attempted to give an<br />
unbiased summary <strong>of</strong> the available research with<br />
an emphasis on the lower doses. The strengths and<br />
weaknesses <strong>of</strong> the studies are explained in order<br />
to help assess the variety <strong>of</strong> sometimes conflicting<br />
evidence.<br />
Not every epidemiological study that has ever<br />
been done on the risks <strong>of</strong> radiation is included in<br />
this overview. The body <strong>of</strong> research is simply too<br />
great for us to have collected and read every study.<br />
We attempted to collect studies generally considered<br />
to be key for the various sources <strong>of</strong> exposure and<br />
to exhaust our own capabilities to collect as many<br />
studies as possible. Our search methodology<br />
included the use <strong>of</strong> the PubMed search engine<br />
and smaller follow-up searches through the end <strong>of</strong><br />
2003. Another source <strong>of</strong> epidemiologic data is the<br />
DOE Office <strong>of</strong> Environment, Safety and <strong>Health</strong>’s<br />
“Comprehensive Epidemiologic Data Resource” 1 ,<br />
which provides data sets and studies relating to<br />
worker health at DOE facilities, populations residing<br />
near DOE sites, atomic bomb survivors, and radium<br />
1 http://cedr.lbl.gov<br />
2 www.lowdose.org<br />
1<br />
dial painters. In light <strong>of</strong> the ongoing generation <strong>of</strong><br />
relevant information we have decided to consider<br />
our overview a work in progress and plan to release<br />
supplements <strong>of</strong> this initial review in the future.<br />
Our intended audience is not necessarily one that<br />
has been scientifically trained and so scientific terms<br />
will be discussed and defined in a glossary found at<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the overview. The two following terms<br />
from our title defined the scope <strong>of</strong> our overview:<br />
<strong>Ionizing</strong> radiation refers to radiation that has<br />
enough energy to remove an electron from a neutral<br />
atom or molecule, creating a free radical. <strong>Ionizing</strong><br />
radiation is capable <strong>of</strong> creating DNA damage that<br />
can lead to cancer. <strong>Radiation</strong>s from sources such as<br />
power lines, cell phones, and traffic radars are all<br />
classified as non-ionizing radiation because they<br />
are not capable <strong>of</strong> removing an electron. There is<br />
ongoing research concerning health effects <strong>of</strong> nonionizing<br />
radiation but it will not be covered in this<br />
overview.<br />
Low dose. Although we have collected studies<br />
<strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> exposures we should define a low<br />
dose as a reference point for the reader. Generally<br />
speaking, a dose is low relative to doses where<br />
the evidence <strong>of</strong> a health risk is more robust. The<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Energy’s (DOE) Low Dose <strong>Radiation</strong><br />
Research Program 2 has the fuzzy definition <strong>of</strong> any<br />
dose not documented to show significant health risks;<br />
they generally consider a low dose to be below 10<br />
rem or 0.1 Sieverts (Sv). The <strong>Health</strong> Physics Society<br />
recommends that exposures below 0.1 Sv only be<br />
evaluated qualitatively as the risks are too small to<br />
be observed. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> our overview we<br />
have considered doses below 0.1 Sv to be low.