02.06.2013 Views

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

adiation due primarily to radioactive elements in the<br />

soil. These include Kerala, South India; Yangjiang,<br />

China; Guarapari, Brazil; and Ramsar, Iran (Figure<br />

2-2). Chromosome aberrations, evidence <strong>of</strong> DNA<br />

damage that could also lead to cancer, are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

measured to assess the potential risk associated with<br />

an exposure, and several rudimentary explorations<br />

<strong>of</strong> chromosome aberrations in these areas have been<br />

made. In Guarapari, an area with 10-100 times the<br />

normal background exposure, researchers found<br />

an increase <strong>of</strong> about 30% in chromosome breaks<br />

compared to a control area (Barcinski et al. 1975).<br />

In Kerala exposure has been estimated to be 15-30<br />

times higher than surrounding areas. Kochupillai<br />

et al. (1976) found a significant increase in some<br />

types <strong>of</strong> aberrations but not others 2 . Preliminary<br />

assessments <strong>of</strong> Ramsar and Yangjiang have not<br />

detected increases in aberrations compared to local<br />

control areas (Ghiassi-nejad et al. 2002, Hayata et<br />

al. 2000). A series <strong>of</strong> papers published following<br />

a collaboration between Chinese and Japanese<br />

researchers assessed possible health effects<br />

Background <strong>Radiation</strong> 15<br />

Figure 2-2. Areas around the world having high external exposure to terrestrial radiation (mSv/yr) (http://www.angelfire.<br />

com/mo/radioadaptive/ramsar.html).<br />

attributable to high background radiation rates in<br />

Yangjiang. This study did not detect an elevated<br />

cancer risk (Sun et al. 2000, Tao et al. 2000, Zou et<br />

al. 2000). A simple cross-sectional survey conducted<br />

in Kerala, in panchayats with background exposures<br />

as high as 70 mGy/yr, did not find a correlation<br />

between cancer incidence and exposure (Nair et al.<br />

1999). Although radiation measurements were made<br />

in over 60,000 houses, the correlation analysis was<br />

made on the panchayat level and did not address any<br />

potential confounding factors.<br />

Radon. As we mentioned above, radon is the<br />

major source <strong>of</strong> background radiation exposure.<br />

Studies <strong>of</strong> radon in homes and in mines are hard to<br />

compare with other studies <strong>of</strong> radiation because <strong>of</strong><br />

the nature <strong>of</strong> radon and the exposure terminology<br />

associated with it. Radon exposure is in truth<br />

exposure to both radon and airborne decay products<br />

<strong>of</strong> radon, or radon daughters. Radon in mines is<br />

typically measured in working level months (WLM),<br />

a unit that is described in more detail in the section<br />

on miners (section 8). Radon in homes is commonly<br />

2 There was a roughly 2-fold increase in chromatid-type aberrations (not significant) and a significant 10-fold increase<br />

in chromosome-type aberrations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!