Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
114 <strong>Radiation</strong> Exposure in Flight<br />
fact that AML incidence apparently increased with<br />
the duration <strong>of</strong> employment 2 . An American study<br />
<strong>of</strong> pilots found elevated prostate cancer mortality<br />
and significantly increased mortality from cancer<br />
<strong>of</strong> the kidney or renal pelvis. This study showed<br />
equivocal leukemia results (16 observed cases and<br />
~15 expected) but did not separate leukemia cases<br />
by type (Nicholas et al 1998).<br />
The rest <strong>of</strong> the studies that we looked at were<br />
conducted in northern Europe and compared cancer<br />
rates in flight crew to national rates. All but one<br />
<strong>of</strong> these studies found significantly increased skin<br />
cancer incidence, and one found a significant skin<br />
cancer trend with dose (Pukkala et al 2002) 3 . A<br />
study <strong>of</strong> Danish pilots found a three-fold increase<br />
in AML but the result was not significant (4 cases,<br />
1.4 expected cases). When dividing the cohort by<br />
type <strong>of</strong> aircraft flown, however, jet pilots (who<br />
fly at higher altitudes) were observed to have a<br />
significantly increased risk <strong>of</strong> AML 4 (Gundestrap<br />
and Storm 1999). A study <strong>of</strong> Norwegian flight<br />
attendants found significantly increased incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
cancer <strong>of</strong> the skin, liver, upper respiratory tract, and<br />
gastric tract in men, and <strong>of</strong> skin cancer in women.<br />
Total cancer rates were also increased (Haldorsen et<br />
al 2001). A study <strong>of</strong> German flight attendants found<br />
no significant mortality differences with the general<br />
population (Blettner et al 2002) but did not analyze<br />
cancer incidence.<br />
Each <strong>of</strong> these studies alone is somewhat limited<br />
by small numbers and so it is useful to attempt a<br />
meta-analysis that pools multiple study results.<br />
Elsebeth Lynge from the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Copenhagen<br />
did this in 2001: among male pilots there were<br />
increases in three types <strong>of</strong> cancer- prostate cancer<br />
(SIR 1.3), skin cancer (SIR 2.0) and AML (SIR 3.8,<br />
1.9-6.7). Among female flight attendants there was<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> increased breast cancer risk (SIR 1.4)<br />
and among men there was evidence <strong>of</strong> increased<br />
liver and upper respiratory tract cancer (perhaps due<br />
to drinking). Flight attendants also showed weak<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> increased total leukemia risk in addition<br />
to a clear increase in skin cancer incidence.<br />
The most consistent finding in these studies was<br />
increased skin cancer and it is not clear that this is<br />
linked to radiation. The Danish study found similar<br />
skin cancer results in high- and low-altitude pilots,<br />
evidence against a radiation cause. One author has<br />
suggested that flying over multiple time zones might<br />
contribute to skin cancer (melanoma) by disrupting<br />
circadian rhythms and thus the homeostasis <strong>of</strong><br />
melatonin (Raffnson et al 2000), and various authors<br />
have proposed that lifestyle factors unique to flight<br />
crew (excessive sunbathing) might be involved or<br />
that increased detection plays a role. On the other<br />
hand the largest study found a significant skin cancer<br />
trend with dose (Pukkala et al 2002).<br />
9.2 Cell studies<br />
Several studies have looked for cell-level<br />
abnormalities in pilots and other flight crew with<br />
mixed results. Two studies by an Italian research<br />
team looked for chromosome abnormalities and<br />
DNA damage. These authors found increased<br />
‘stable’ chromosome abnormalities (translocations,<br />
gaps and breaks), nonsignificant elevations <strong>of</strong><br />
‘unstable’ abnormalities (micronuclei, dicentrics,<br />
fragments and rings), and a nonsignificant increase<br />
in DNA single or double strand breaks (RR 1.36;<br />
0.46, 3.98). In another Italian study Romano et al.<br />
(1997) found roughly twice as many dicentric and<br />
ring chromosomes in Italian flight personnel as in<br />
controls. Heimers (2000) found increased numbers<br />
<strong>of</strong> dicentric chromosomes (~8-fold increase) and<br />
translocations (~4-fold increase) in British Concorde<br />
pilots exposed to 3-6 mSv/yr. Nicholas et al. (2003)<br />
found a roughly threefold increase in translocations<br />
among pilots. In a study <strong>of</strong> Dutch flight engineers<br />
two types <strong>of</strong> effects were studied- DNA damage and<br />
DNA protection and repair. Flight engineers were<br />
shown to have significantly higher rates <strong>of</strong> oxidative<br />
2 For two cases with less than 20 years <strong>of</strong> employment the SIR was 3.8 (90% CI 0.7, 11.9); for four cases with over<br />
twenty years <strong>of</strong> employment the SIR was 5.4 (90% CI 1.8, 12.4)<br />
3 Compared to pilots with less than 3 mSv <strong>of</strong> cumulative dose, pilots with more than 20 mSv were almost three times<br />
more likely to develop melanoma (RR 2.78; 1.30, 5.93).<br />
4 Among all jet pilots 3 cases <strong>of</strong> AML were observed versus 0.65 expected (SIR 4.6; 0.9, 13.4). All <strong>of</strong> these cases were<br />
in pilots with more than 5000 flight hours, bringing the SIR for that group to 5.1. Among non-jet pilots there was 1<br />
case <strong>of</strong> AML (0.75 expected).