Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Preconceptional exposures are discussed in detail in<br />
section 10 and appendix C.<br />
3.7 Radiologists’ occupational exposures<br />
In contrast to estimates <strong>of</strong> the controlled exposure<br />
received by patients, exposure estimates for<br />
radiologists are uncertain and <strong>of</strong>ten based on the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> years a radiologist is certified. Exposures<br />
have decreased dramatically over time, so that a<br />
although radiologist in the 1920s or 30s might have<br />
been exposed to 1 Gy per year, exposures today<br />
are about a thousand times less (0.5 mGy per year;<br />
Berrington et al. 2001).<br />
Doody et al. (1998) and Mohan et al. (2003)<br />
conducted a cohort study <strong>of</strong> radiologists in the US.<br />
Mortality was lower, overall, than in the general<br />
population, indicating a healthy worker effect.<br />
Comparisons between radiologists first employed in<br />
the 1940s or 50s and radiologists entering the field<br />
more recently are useful because, as noted above,<br />
exposure has declined over time. Radiologists in<br />
the 1950s were likely exposed to 50-100 mGy per<br />
year (Berrington et al. 2001). Mohan et al. found<br />
increased risks <strong>of</strong> breast cancer (RR 2.92, 1.22-<br />
7.00) and leukemia (RR 1.64, 0.42-6.31) making<br />
such comparisons 39 . This study also found that the<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> breast cancer or leukemia was related to the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> years working in the field before 1950.<br />
Sigurdson et al. (2003) found that radiologists who<br />
were employed in the US between 1926 and 1982<br />
were at elevated risk <strong>of</strong> all solid tumors, breast<br />
cancer, melanoma, and thyroid cancer. Although<br />
the eligibility requirements for the study were that<br />
radiologists must have been certified in the US<br />
between 1926 and 1982, thus allowing for earlier<br />
employees who may have had higher exposures,<br />
78% <strong>of</strong> the cohort was first certified in 1960 or<br />
later. This implies that the doses that radiologists<br />
received were low, although there are no direct<br />
dose estimates available. Berrington et al. (2001)<br />
looked at occupational exposure in the UK and<br />
found again that there was a significant risk only for<br />
those radiologists who had been registered for over<br />
40 years. In conclusion, although risks associated<br />
Medical Exposures 31<br />
with historical exposures can be quantified, the<br />
risks associated with the low doses that radiologists<br />
currently receive would be too small to be detected<br />
by epidemiological methods (Brenner and Hall<br />
2003).<br />
3.8 Conclusions<br />
There are several areas <strong>of</strong> medical radiation<br />
epidemiology that have a particularly strong body<br />
<strong>of</strong> evidence associating low doses and risk. Several<br />
important characteristics <strong>of</strong> these risks have been<br />
described in the studies discussed above:<br />
• There is a wide body <strong>of</strong> research that shows<br />
that radiation therapy for non-cancer disease<br />
can cause cancer in patients, although these<br />
are typically high-dose exposures. <strong>Radiation</strong><br />
therapy varies according to the disease being<br />
treated, the parts <strong>of</strong> the body that are exposed,<br />
and the cancer sites that might respond.<br />
Leukemia and cancers <strong>of</strong> the pancreas, stomach,<br />
small intestine, liver, gall bladder, kidney, brain,<br />
central nervous system, connective tissue,<br />
breast, and thyroid have all been associated<br />
with therapeutic exposure. Davis et al. (1989),<br />
Boice et al. (1991) and Little and Boice (1999)<br />
show some <strong>of</strong> the most compelling evidence for<br />
the risks <strong>of</strong> low dose and fractionated exposure<br />
where fluoroscopy patients who were exposed<br />
to small doses over time show risks similar to<br />
those observed in the atomic bomb survivors.<br />
• Comparisons <strong>of</strong> medical exposure and atomic<br />
bomb studies seem to show that some cell-killing<br />
and risk attenuation effects may occur with<br />
fractionated doses (Little et al. 1999), but there<br />
is also evidence suggesting that radiosensitive<br />
tissues such as the breast may be more sensitive<br />
to fractionated doses (Boice et al. 1991, Doody<br />
et al. 2000, Davis et al. 1999).<br />
• Gibson et al. (1972), Preston Martin et al. (1988),<br />
Preston-Martin et al. (1988), and Doody et al.<br />
(2000) have found risks <strong>of</strong> leukemia, parotid<br />
gland tumors and breast cancer associated<br />
39 The breast cancer risk estimate compares first employment before 1940 to after 1960; the leukemia risk estimate<br />
compares first employment before or after 1950.