02.06.2013 Views

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Preconceptional exposures are discussed in detail in<br />

section 10 and appendix C.<br />

3.7 Radiologists’ occupational exposures<br />

In contrast to estimates <strong>of</strong> the controlled exposure<br />

received by patients, exposure estimates for<br />

radiologists are uncertain and <strong>of</strong>ten based on the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> years a radiologist is certified. Exposures<br />

have decreased dramatically over time, so that a<br />

although radiologist in the 1920s or 30s might have<br />

been exposed to 1 Gy per year, exposures today<br />

are about a thousand times less (0.5 mGy per year;<br />

Berrington et al. 2001).<br />

Doody et al. (1998) and Mohan et al. (2003)<br />

conducted a cohort study <strong>of</strong> radiologists in the US.<br />

Mortality was lower, overall, than in the general<br />

population, indicating a healthy worker effect.<br />

Comparisons between radiologists first employed in<br />

the 1940s or 50s and radiologists entering the field<br />

more recently are useful because, as noted above,<br />

exposure has declined over time. Radiologists in<br />

the 1950s were likely exposed to 50-100 mGy per<br />

year (Berrington et al. 2001). Mohan et al. found<br />

increased risks <strong>of</strong> breast cancer (RR 2.92, 1.22-<br />

7.00) and leukemia (RR 1.64, 0.42-6.31) making<br />

such comparisons 39 . This study also found that the<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> breast cancer or leukemia was related to the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> years working in the field before 1950.<br />

Sigurdson et al. (2003) found that radiologists who<br />

were employed in the US between 1926 and 1982<br />

were at elevated risk <strong>of</strong> all solid tumors, breast<br />

cancer, melanoma, and thyroid cancer. Although<br />

the eligibility requirements for the study were that<br />

radiologists must have been certified in the US<br />

between 1926 and 1982, thus allowing for earlier<br />

employees who may have had higher exposures,<br />

78% <strong>of</strong> the cohort was first certified in 1960 or<br />

later. This implies that the doses that radiologists<br />

received were low, although there are no direct<br />

dose estimates available. Berrington et al. (2001)<br />

looked at occupational exposure in the UK and<br />

found again that there was a significant risk only for<br />

those radiologists who had been registered for over<br />

40 years. In conclusion, although risks associated<br />

Medical Exposures 31<br />

with historical exposures can be quantified, the<br />

risks associated with the low doses that radiologists<br />

currently receive would be too small to be detected<br />

by epidemiological methods (Brenner and Hall<br />

2003).<br />

3.8 Conclusions<br />

There are several areas <strong>of</strong> medical radiation<br />

epidemiology that have a particularly strong body<br />

<strong>of</strong> evidence associating low doses and risk. Several<br />

important characteristics <strong>of</strong> these risks have been<br />

described in the studies discussed above:<br />

• There is a wide body <strong>of</strong> research that shows<br />

that radiation therapy for non-cancer disease<br />

can cause cancer in patients, although these<br />

are typically high-dose exposures. <strong>Radiation</strong><br />

therapy varies according to the disease being<br />

treated, the parts <strong>of</strong> the body that are exposed,<br />

and the cancer sites that might respond.<br />

Leukemia and cancers <strong>of</strong> the pancreas, stomach,<br />

small intestine, liver, gall bladder, kidney, brain,<br />

central nervous system, connective tissue,<br />

breast, and thyroid have all been associated<br />

with therapeutic exposure. Davis et al. (1989),<br />

Boice et al. (1991) and Little and Boice (1999)<br />

show some <strong>of</strong> the most compelling evidence for<br />

the risks <strong>of</strong> low dose and fractionated exposure<br />

where fluoroscopy patients who were exposed<br />

to small doses over time show risks similar to<br />

those observed in the atomic bomb survivors.<br />

• Comparisons <strong>of</strong> medical exposure and atomic<br />

bomb studies seem to show that some cell-killing<br />

and risk attenuation effects may occur with<br />

fractionated doses (Little et al. 1999), but there<br />

is also evidence suggesting that radiosensitive<br />

tissues such as the breast may be more sensitive<br />

to fractionated doses (Boice et al. 1991, Doody<br />

et al. 2000, Davis et al. 1999).<br />

• Gibson et al. (1972), Preston Martin et al. (1988),<br />

Preston-Martin et al. (1988), and Doody et al.<br />

(2000) have found risks <strong>of</strong> leukemia, parotid<br />

gland tumors and breast cancer associated<br />

39 The breast cancer risk estimate compares first employment before 1940 to after 1960; the leukemia risk estimate<br />

compares first employment before or after 1950.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!