02.06.2013 Views

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

0.10-4.71) while respiratory system cancers had a<br />

nonsignificant estimate (ERR <strong>of</strong> 1.04/Gy; -0.89-<br />

2.96).<br />

A 2000 report (Ivanov et al. 2000) presented<br />

risk estimates for non-cancer diseases among 68,309<br />

workers. Significant dose-response relationships<br />

were found for endocrine and metabolic disorders<br />

(including thyroid disease, ERR 0.58/Gy), mental<br />

disorders (ERR 0.4/Gy), nervous system disease<br />

(ERR 0.35/Gy), digestive system disease (ERR<br />

0.24/Gy), cerebrovascular disease (ERR 1.17/Gy)<br />

and essential hypertension (ERR 0.52/Gy).<br />

A 2001 report addressed mortality in 65,905<br />

workers (Ivanov et al. 2001). Although mortality for<br />

this group was no higher than for the general Russian<br />

population, this could be explained by assuming<br />

that the workers were healthier than average and<br />

had a lower mortality risk before they were exposed<br />

(the healthy worker effect). The authors did detect<br />

significant dose-response relationships for malignant<br />

neoplasms and cardiovascular disease. Using the<br />

general Russian population as a control group they<br />

determined that there was an ERR <strong>of</strong> 2.1/Sv (1.3-<br />

2.9) for cancer mortality and 0.5/Sv (0.2-0.9) for<br />

cardiovascular disease mortality.<br />

We looked at two studies <strong>of</strong> the immune system<br />

response <strong>of</strong> Chernobyl clean-up workers. Kurjane et<br />

al. (2001) studied the immune status <strong>of</strong> 385 Latvian<br />

clean-up workers exposed at Chernobyl. They found<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> impaired immune systems including<br />

a reduction in T cells and neutrophil phagocyte<br />

activity. The authors also detected altered levels<br />

<strong>of</strong> certain antibodies. Kuzmenok et al. (2003) also<br />

found evidence <strong>of</strong> impaired immune systems in 134<br />

Belarussian cleanup workers although they found<br />

normal numbers <strong>of</strong> T-cells.<br />

Investigations into genetic damage in cleanup<br />

workers have shown persistent damage in exposed<br />

workers but have not shown clear evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

elevated mutations in the <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> exposed<br />

workers. Melnov et al. (2002) showed an apparent<br />

increase in aberrations over time and Neronova<br />

et al. (2003) found persistent 10-fold increases in<br />

aberrations up to 13 years after exposure. Mutations<br />

in the germ cells <strong>of</strong> exposed workers might be passed<br />

on to <strong>of</strong>fspring. This has been seen in families living<br />

near Chernobyl or the Semipalatinsk Test Site and it<br />

has also been observed in mice (Dubrova et al. 2003).<br />

Livshits et al. (2001) measured specific mutations in<br />

Nuclear Power Accidents 133<br />

183 children born to Chernobyl cleanup workers and<br />

in 163 controls. Dose estimates were only available<br />

for 28% <strong>of</strong> the cleanup workers and they ranged<br />

from 0.05 to 1.2 Sv. No significant differences<br />

were found between exposed and control families,<br />

although children conceived within 2 months<br />

<strong>of</strong> exposure showed a nonsignificant increase in<br />

mutations compared to children conceived 4 months<br />

after exposure or later. This is in agreement with<br />

observations in mice that suggest that the most<br />

sensitive time for this type <strong>of</strong> effect is during sperm<br />

maturation. Kiuru et al. (2003) measured a group <strong>of</strong><br />

mutations (largely overlapping with the mutations<br />

measured by Livshits et al.) in 192 Estonian families<br />

with children born before and after the father was<br />

exposed at Chernobyl. There was a nonsignificant<br />

increase in mutations in the exposed group (children<br />

born after the father’s exposure). This increase was<br />

greater, and almost significant, for paternal external<br />

doses between 20 and 30 cSv, with an OR <strong>of</strong> 3<br />

(0.97-9.3). No effect <strong>of</strong> time between exposure and<br />

conception was found.<br />

Studies <strong>of</strong> these workers must be interpreted<br />

with some caution because individual doses are not<br />

known with much certainty. Another consideration,<br />

potentially more important than uncertainty in doses,<br />

is the fact these workers were screened for health<br />

effects at a higher rate than average Russians. This<br />

was because <strong>of</strong> the known occupational hazard that<br />

they had been exposed to and it may have led to an<br />

overestimate <strong>of</strong> the risk.<br />

11.2.3 Childhood thyroid cancer<br />

The most prominent health effect <strong>of</strong> the Chernobyl<br />

accident has been childhood thyroid cancer. The<br />

thyroid is a gland in the neck that uses iodine in<br />

the synthesis <strong>of</strong> thyroid hormone. Since it can’t<br />

distinguish between radioactive iodine and stable<br />

iodine, iodine isotopes in fallout can accumulate<br />

in the thyroid. This is particularly important in the<br />

fast-growing thyroids <strong>of</strong> young children. The major<br />

isotope involved is iodine-131 (I-131).<br />

One 1997 review article commented on the initial<br />

skepticism among the scientific community about<br />

potentially substantial disease outcomes in people<br />

living near Chernobyl; this eventually gave way to<br />

a consensus acceptance <strong>of</strong> a dramatic increase in<br />

childhood thyroid cancer (Schwenn and Brill 1997).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!