Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
0.10-4.71) while respiratory system cancers had a<br />
nonsignificant estimate (ERR <strong>of</strong> 1.04/Gy; -0.89-<br />
2.96).<br />
A 2000 report (Ivanov et al. 2000) presented<br />
risk estimates for non-cancer diseases among 68,309<br />
workers. Significant dose-response relationships<br />
were found for endocrine and metabolic disorders<br />
(including thyroid disease, ERR 0.58/Gy), mental<br />
disorders (ERR 0.4/Gy), nervous system disease<br />
(ERR 0.35/Gy), digestive system disease (ERR<br />
0.24/Gy), cerebrovascular disease (ERR 1.17/Gy)<br />
and essential hypertension (ERR 0.52/Gy).<br />
A 2001 report addressed mortality in 65,905<br />
workers (Ivanov et al. 2001). Although mortality for<br />
this group was no higher than for the general Russian<br />
population, this could be explained by assuming<br />
that the workers were healthier than average and<br />
had a lower mortality risk before they were exposed<br />
(the healthy worker effect). The authors did detect<br />
significant dose-response relationships for malignant<br />
neoplasms and cardiovascular disease. Using the<br />
general Russian population as a control group they<br />
determined that there was an ERR <strong>of</strong> 2.1/Sv (1.3-<br />
2.9) for cancer mortality and 0.5/Sv (0.2-0.9) for<br />
cardiovascular disease mortality.<br />
We looked at two studies <strong>of</strong> the immune system<br />
response <strong>of</strong> Chernobyl clean-up workers. Kurjane et<br />
al. (2001) studied the immune status <strong>of</strong> 385 Latvian<br />
clean-up workers exposed at Chernobyl. They found<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> impaired immune systems including<br />
a reduction in T cells and neutrophil phagocyte<br />
activity. The authors also detected altered levels<br />
<strong>of</strong> certain antibodies. Kuzmenok et al. (2003) also<br />
found evidence <strong>of</strong> impaired immune systems in 134<br />
Belarussian cleanup workers although they found<br />
normal numbers <strong>of</strong> T-cells.<br />
Investigations into genetic damage in cleanup<br />
workers have shown persistent damage in exposed<br />
workers but have not shown clear evidence <strong>of</strong><br />
elevated mutations in the <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> exposed<br />
workers. Melnov et al. (2002) showed an apparent<br />
increase in aberrations over time and Neronova<br />
et al. (2003) found persistent 10-fold increases in<br />
aberrations up to 13 years after exposure. Mutations<br />
in the germ cells <strong>of</strong> exposed workers might be passed<br />
on to <strong>of</strong>fspring. This has been seen in families living<br />
near Chernobyl or the Semipalatinsk Test Site and it<br />
has also been observed in mice (Dubrova et al. 2003).<br />
Livshits et al. (2001) measured specific mutations in<br />
Nuclear Power Accidents 133<br />
183 children born to Chernobyl cleanup workers and<br />
in 163 controls. Dose estimates were only available<br />
for 28% <strong>of</strong> the cleanup workers and they ranged<br />
from 0.05 to 1.2 Sv. No significant differences<br />
were found between exposed and control families,<br />
although children conceived within 2 months<br />
<strong>of</strong> exposure showed a nonsignificant increase in<br />
mutations compared to children conceived 4 months<br />
after exposure or later. This is in agreement with<br />
observations in mice that suggest that the most<br />
sensitive time for this type <strong>of</strong> effect is during sperm<br />
maturation. Kiuru et al. (2003) measured a group <strong>of</strong><br />
mutations (largely overlapping with the mutations<br />
measured by Livshits et al.) in 192 Estonian families<br />
with children born before and after the father was<br />
exposed at Chernobyl. There was a nonsignificant<br />
increase in mutations in the exposed group (children<br />
born after the father’s exposure). This increase was<br />
greater, and almost significant, for paternal external<br />
doses between 20 and 30 cSv, with an OR <strong>of</strong> 3<br />
(0.97-9.3). No effect <strong>of</strong> time between exposure and<br />
conception was found.<br />
Studies <strong>of</strong> these workers must be interpreted<br />
with some caution because individual doses are not<br />
known with much certainty. Another consideration,<br />
potentially more important than uncertainty in doses,<br />
is the fact these workers were screened for health<br />
effects at a higher rate than average Russians. This<br />
was because <strong>of</strong> the known occupational hazard that<br />
they had been exposed to and it may have led to an<br />
overestimate <strong>of</strong> the risk.<br />
11.2.3 Childhood thyroid cancer<br />
The most prominent health effect <strong>of</strong> the Chernobyl<br />
accident has been childhood thyroid cancer. The<br />
thyroid is a gland in the neck that uses iodine in<br />
the synthesis <strong>of</strong> thyroid hormone. Since it can’t<br />
distinguish between radioactive iodine and stable<br />
iodine, iodine isotopes in fallout can accumulate<br />
in the thyroid. This is particularly important in the<br />
fast-growing thyroids <strong>of</strong> young children. The major<br />
isotope involved is iodine-131 (I-131).<br />
One 1997 review article commented on the initial<br />
skepticism among the scientific community about<br />
potentially substantial disease outcomes in people<br />
living near Chernobyl; this eventually gave way to<br />
a consensus acceptance <strong>of</strong> a dramatic increase in<br />
childhood thyroid cancer (Schwenn and Brill 1997).