Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
88 <strong>Radiation</strong> Workers<br />
Table 6-1. Leukemia in nuclear workers and atomic bomb survivors. Number <strong>of</strong> cases or deaths<br />
(%) and ERR estimate from each study where available 1 .<br />
Three-country mortality<br />
(Cardis et al. 1995)<br />
Total 146 deaths<br />
1.6/Sv<br />
ALL 11 (8%)<br />
-0.9/Sv<br />
AML 32 (22%)<br />
3.4/Sv<br />
CML 28 (19%)<br />
11/Sv<br />
CLL 27 (18%)<br />
0/Sv 2<br />
concluded that the association cannot be ruled out.<br />
Multiple myeloma has been significantly<br />
associated with radiation at Hanford, Oak Ridge,<br />
Rocketdyne, Sellafield, and in pooled cohorts. The<br />
mortality ERR estimate from the three-country<br />
study was 4.2/Sv (90% CI 0.3-14.4), very close to<br />
the estimate <strong>of</strong> the NRPB (4.1/Sv, 90% CI 0.03-14.8;<br />
Muirhead et al. 1999). This estimate is almost 4 times<br />
higher than the atomic bomb survivors estimate<br />
(1.15/Sv, 90% CI 0.30-2.7; Preston et al. 2003). In a<br />
separate analysis <strong>of</strong> workers at four US sites Wing et<br />
al. (2000) found a significant multiple myeloma risk<br />
among workers exposed to radiation after age 45,<br />
and the estimated ERR for these workers was ~7/Sv<br />
assuming a 5-year lag time 37 .<br />
Solid cancer. The estimated ERR for solid cancer<br />
in the three-country workers study was negative<br />
and the upper confidence limit was lower than the<br />
estimate from the atomic bomb survivors. There is<br />
probably some explanation for this difference, and<br />
it might include a number <strong>of</strong> factors. First, there<br />
were no children among the workers, and children<br />
are <strong>of</strong>ten more sensitive to the effects <strong>of</strong> radiation.<br />
Canadian workers<br />
incidence (Sont et al. 2001)<br />
98 cases<br />
5.4/Sv<br />
Atomic bomb survivors<br />
incidence (Preston et al. 1994)<br />
231 cases<br />
3.9/Sv<br />
- 32 (14%)<br />
10.3/Sv<br />
26 (27%)<br />
5.2/Sv<br />
25 (26%)<br />
-<br />
103 (45%)<br />
3.3/Sv<br />
57 (25%)<br />
6.2/Sv<br />
- 4 (2%)<br />
-<br />
1 Although this table is comparing mortality to incidence data, the proportions <strong>of</strong> subtypes should be<br />
relatively similar. There is some overlap between the Canadian cohort and the three-country study.<br />
2 The estimated ERR for CLL was –0.95/Sv (90% CI