02.06.2013 Views

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 <strong>Radiation</strong> Workers<br />

Table 6-1. Leukemia in nuclear workers and atomic bomb survivors. Number <strong>of</strong> cases or deaths<br />

(%) and ERR estimate from each study where available 1 .<br />

Three-country mortality<br />

(Cardis et al. 1995)<br />

Total 146 deaths<br />

1.6/Sv<br />

ALL 11 (8%)<br />

-0.9/Sv<br />

AML 32 (22%)<br />

3.4/Sv<br />

CML 28 (19%)<br />

11/Sv<br />

CLL 27 (18%)<br />

0/Sv 2<br />

concluded that the association cannot be ruled out.<br />

Multiple myeloma has been significantly<br />

associated with radiation at Hanford, Oak Ridge,<br />

Rocketdyne, Sellafield, and in pooled cohorts. The<br />

mortality ERR estimate from the three-country<br />

study was 4.2/Sv (90% CI 0.3-14.4), very close to<br />

the estimate <strong>of</strong> the NRPB (4.1/Sv, 90% CI 0.03-14.8;<br />

Muirhead et al. 1999). This estimate is almost 4 times<br />

higher than the atomic bomb survivors estimate<br />

(1.15/Sv, 90% CI 0.30-2.7; Preston et al. 2003). In a<br />

separate analysis <strong>of</strong> workers at four US sites Wing et<br />

al. (2000) found a significant multiple myeloma risk<br />

among workers exposed to radiation after age 45,<br />

and the estimated ERR for these workers was ~7/Sv<br />

assuming a 5-year lag time 37 .<br />

Solid cancer. The estimated ERR for solid cancer<br />

in the three-country workers study was negative<br />

and the upper confidence limit was lower than the<br />

estimate from the atomic bomb survivors. There is<br />

probably some explanation for this difference, and<br />

it might include a number <strong>of</strong> factors. First, there<br />

were no children among the workers, and children<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten more sensitive to the effects <strong>of</strong> radiation.<br />

Canadian workers<br />

incidence (Sont et al. 2001)<br />

98 cases<br />

5.4/Sv<br />

Atomic bomb survivors<br />

incidence (Preston et al. 1994)<br />

231 cases<br />

3.9/Sv<br />

- 32 (14%)<br />

10.3/Sv<br />

26 (27%)<br />

5.2/Sv<br />

25 (26%)<br />

-<br />

103 (45%)<br />

3.3/Sv<br />

57 (25%)<br />

6.2/Sv<br />

- 4 (2%)<br />

-<br />

1 Although this table is comparing mortality to incidence data, the proportions <strong>of</strong> subtypes should be<br />

relatively similar. There is some overlap between the Canadian cohort and the three-country study.<br />

2 The estimated ERR for CLL was –0.95/Sv (90% CI

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!