Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>of</strong> leukemia was measured over a larger area around<br />
each site. The only site associated with a significant<br />
excess <strong>of</strong> cases was Dounreay. In a similar analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> childhood brain cancer and other non-LNHL<br />
cancers at the seven sites Sharp et al. (1999) showed<br />
a significant excess in only one case, central nervous<br />
system (CNS) tumors around the Rosyth nuclear<br />
submarine base (136 observed and 111.5 expected<br />
cases).<br />
The Office <strong>of</strong> Population Censuses and Surveys<br />
(OPCS) published a comprehensive report on cancer<br />
mortality near nuclear facilities in the UK in 1987<br />
(Cook-Mozaffari et al. 1987, Forman et al. 1987).<br />
Many relative risk estimates were made for different<br />
groupings <strong>of</strong> age at exposure, facility, and cancer;<br />
13 estimates were significantly positive and 38<br />
were significantly negative. For example, childhood<br />
lymphoid leukemia mortality at all facilities was<br />
significantly increased (RR 2.00, p=0.005) while<br />
adult mortality from leukemia, myeloma, or any<br />
cancer was significantly below normal 15 . Childhood<br />
leukemia results were in some cases confusing-<br />
mortality increased with proximity to five facilities<br />
that began operations before 1955 but this trend<br />
was reversed for seven facilities running since<br />
1960. Overall, however, the evidence supports<br />
an increased leukemia risk. When the young age<br />
group was restricted to 0-9 years the results became<br />
stronger: within 6 miles <strong>of</strong> the pre-1955 facilities<br />
the lymphoid leukemia RR was 3.95 (p=0.001) and<br />
there was a stronger trend with proximity to the<br />
facilities (p=0.035). These results were validated<br />
using a different methodological approach (Cook-<br />
Mozaffari et al. 1989a) and it was shown that<br />
potential sites <strong>of</strong> nuclear installations did not have<br />
the same childhood leukemia risk as existing sites<br />
(Cook-Mozaffari et al. 1989b) 16 .<br />
12.4 Nuclear facilities outside the US and UK<br />
La Hague reprocessing plant in Normandy, France<br />
Communities Near Nuclear Facilities 151<br />
began operating in 1966. Cancer mortality around<br />
La Hague was analyzed by Dousset (1989), who<br />
found no difference between rates within 10 km <strong>of</strong><br />
the facility and rates in the rest <strong>of</strong> the departement<br />
de la Manche (where the facility is located). Viel<br />
and Richardson (1990), after considering the reports<br />
from Seascale and Caithness, focused on childhood<br />
leukemia mortality. Between 1968 and 1986 there<br />
were 21 deaths from childhood leukemia within 35<br />
km <strong>of</strong> La Hague, consistent with rates for the rest <strong>of</strong><br />
the departement. Hattchouel et al. (1995) examined<br />
childhood leukemia mortality nationwide and found<br />
what appeared to be a decrement with an SMR <strong>of</strong><br />
0.80 (0.62-1.01); younger ages did not appear to be<br />
at higher risk in this study.<br />
In contrast to these results for leukemia mortality,<br />
studies <strong>of</strong> childhood leukemia incidence around La<br />
Hague demonstrated an apparent cluster 17 within<br />
10 km <strong>of</strong> the site (Viel et al. 1993, Viel et al. 1995,<br />
Guizard et al. 2001) and led to a case-control study<br />
that was published in 1997 (Pobel and Viel). The<br />
case-control study presented evidence that exposure<br />
to local beaches and seafood were risk factors<br />
for childhood leukemia. Cases and controls were<br />
grouped according to how <strong>of</strong>ten mothers spent time<br />
at local beaches, how <strong>of</strong>ten children spent time at<br />
local beaches, and how <strong>of</strong>ten children ate local fish<br />
and shellfish. In all three cases there were significant<br />
exposure-response trends. Children who played at<br />
the beach more than once a month showed a relative<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> 2.87 (1.05-8.72) and children who ate local<br />
seafood more than once a week showed a relative<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> 2.66 (0.91-9.51). These authors also found<br />
a significant risk associated with living in granite<br />
homes, a potential radon risk (RR 1.18; 1.03-1.42).<br />
H<strong>of</strong>fman et al. (1997) investigated a childhood<br />
leukemia cluster in Elbmarsch, Germany, near the<br />
Krummel nuclear power plant. From 1990 to 1995<br />
there were six diagnosed cases within 5 km <strong>of</strong><br />
Krummel, giving an SIR <strong>of</strong> 4.6 (2.1-10.3). All six<br />
cases were from the south side <strong>of</strong> the Elbe river,<br />
15 The relative risks <strong>of</strong> adult leukemia, myeloma, and all cancers were 0.88 (p=0.04), 0.79 (p=016), and 0.96 (p