02.06.2013 Views

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

may be <strong>of</strong> little benefit to those who bear the burden<br />

<strong>of</strong> risk.<br />

A figure such as this can also be misleading<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the variability <strong>of</strong> individual exposure<br />

histories. For example, a person who works in a<br />

nuclear facility will probably be exposed to more<br />

manmade radiation than a person who does not; this<br />

will alter the distribution <strong>of</strong> the pie chart and the<br />

overall amount <strong>of</strong> exposure. A person who lives in<br />

an area <strong>of</strong> particularly high fallout from the Nevada<br />

Test Site will also have a different exposure pattern<br />

than the average American, and so will someone<br />

with a history <strong>of</strong> extensive diagnostic radiation for a<br />

medical condition such as scoliosis.<br />

1.4 Standards<br />

In 1946 the Atomic Energy Act established the<br />

Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) to maintain<br />

control <strong>of</strong> atomic technology and to further its use<br />

for military purposes. In 1954 Congress passed new<br />

legislation outlining three roles for the AEC: 1)<br />

continue its weapons program, 2) promote the private<br />

use <strong>of</strong> atomic energy for peaceful application, and 3)<br />

protect public health and safety from the hazards <strong>of</strong><br />

commercial nuclear power. It soon became apparent<br />

that there was a conflict <strong>of</strong> interest with the same<br />

agency promoting the use <strong>of</strong> nuclear power and<br />

setting the standards <strong>of</strong> safety for this use. In 1974<br />

Congress divided the AEC into the Energy Research<br />

and Development Administration (ERDA) and<br />

the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The<br />

NRC is not the sole agency with regulatory power<br />

regarding nuclear safety. The Federal <strong>Radiation</strong><br />

Council, established in 1959 and consolidated into<br />

the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in<br />

1970, advises the President regarding radiation and<br />

health. The EPA’s radiation protection guides (RPG)<br />

are approved by the President and have the force and<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> law as all federal agencies are required to<br />

follow them. NRC regulations, which nuclear power<br />

facilities must follow, must be consistent with the<br />

RPGs. Other agencies responsible for regulating<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> radiation exposure include the Food<br />

and Drug Administration (FDA), the Occupational<br />

Safety and <strong>Health</strong> Administration (OSHA), the<br />

Introduction 3<br />

Postal Service (USPS), and the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Transportation (DOT). Naturally occurring<br />

radionuclides are normally regulated by state<br />

governments. Twenty nine states regulate byproduct<br />

radioactive material and radiation devices within the<br />

state. 3<br />

Two series <strong>of</strong> reports provide much <strong>of</strong> the data<br />

used in radiation standard setting. The reports are<br />

produced by the National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences’<br />

Committee on the Biological Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ionizing</strong><br />

<strong>Radiation</strong> (NAS/BEIR) and the United Nations<br />

Scientific Committee on the Effects <strong>of</strong> Atomic<br />

<strong>Radiation</strong> (UNSCEAR). Both committees prepare<br />

reports as new data or analyses are made available<br />

indicating that previous risk estimates need to be<br />

revised either up or down.<br />

A relatively new radiation protection advisory<br />

committee was formed in 1997, the European<br />

Committee on <strong>Radiation</strong> Risk (ECRR). This<br />

committee was formed by the Green Group in the<br />

European Parliament to discuss details <strong>of</strong> recent<br />

progress in radiological protection standards.<br />

The ECRR strives to make no assumptions about<br />

radiation safety based on preceding analyses and<br />

to remain independent <strong>of</strong> previous risk assessment<br />

committees such as the ICRP and the UNSCEAR. A<br />

report from the ECRR was released in 2003.<br />

Over the years, as the general consciousness<br />

has evolved about the risks <strong>of</strong> radiation exposure,<br />

the international and national radiation protection<br />

standards have dramatically changed. Figure 1-<br />

2 depicts the change in protection standards for<br />

nuclear workers. Because there is no one standard<br />

that all facilities and workplaces follow, the figure<br />

is based on recommendations <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> sources<br />

and summarizes the overall trend <strong>of</strong> standards.<br />

1.5 <strong>Radiation</strong> basics<br />

The physics and chemistry <strong>of</strong> radiation can be<br />

confusing, and the extensive terminology associated<br />

with radiation makes the problem much worse.<br />

We present below a minimum <strong>of</strong> information to<br />

avoid clouding our focus on epidemiology. Much<br />

more information is available online in the form <strong>of</strong><br />

tutorials and factsheets 4 .<br />

3 www.fpm.wisc.edu/safety/<strong>Radiation</strong>/2000%20Manual/chapter3.pdf<br />

4 For example: www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/cover.htm or www.nirs.org/factsheets/whatisradiation.htm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!