02.06.2013 Views

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Utah (thought to have had greater fallout exposure).<br />

In response to this study a group <strong>of</strong> National Cancer<br />

Institute scientists conducted their own analysis<br />

based on the Lyon study design and using data from<br />

the National Center for <strong>Health</strong> Statistics (NCHS)<br />

(Land et al. 1984). These authors eliminated the first<br />

control group, the 1944-50 birth cohort, because<br />

the NCHS only provides data since 1950. This left<br />

them with two groups to compare, the exposed birth<br />

cohort and a 1959-78 birth cohort. Since leukemia<br />

rates declined from 1950 to 1978 in the United States<br />

generally, Land et al. claimed that the evidence did<br />

not support the leukemia association; without an<br />

early birth cohort, however, this study was not very<br />

informative.<br />

Carl Johnson (1984) conducted an analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> cancer among Utah Mormons, a group with<br />

extensive health records and low background cancer<br />

rates. Separating six towns as high fallout areas,<br />

Johnson found excess cancer, particularly leukemia<br />

and breast, bone and thyroid cancer. He also assessed<br />

cancer incidence among Mormons who remembered<br />

experiencing acute radiation effects such as skin<br />

burns, hair loss or nausea. These subjects appeared to<br />

have excess leukemia, lymphoma, and stomach and<br />

breast cancer relative to all Utah Mormons. Again<br />

the same three scientists from the NCI answered<br />

with a reanalysis using NCHS data (Machado et al.<br />

1987). Their study differed from Johnson’s in that it<br />

used mortality rather than incidence as the endpoint<br />

<strong>of</strong> concern, used county-level data for the three<br />

southwestern Utah counties <strong>of</strong> Washington, Iron<br />

and Kane, and used a slightly different definition <strong>of</strong><br />

the high-exposure time period group 8 . They failed to<br />

find the excess cancers that Johnson found, with the<br />

notable exception <strong>of</strong> leukemia.<br />

Another ambitious paper associated leukemia<br />

with fallout nationwide (Archer 1987). This simple<br />

correlation experiment used state-level leukemia<br />

data and compared them with three indexes <strong>of</strong><br />

exposure: Strontium-90 in cow milk, Stronium-<br />

90 in human bone, and Strontium-90 in diet. Five<br />

states ranked in the top five <strong>of</strong> all three indexes, and<br />

Nuclear Weapons Testing 61<br />

five states ranked in the bottom five; these became<br />

the most exposed and least exposed states, with<br />

all others classified as intermediate 9 . Leukemia<br />

mortality rates in all states were higher in the 1960s<br />

than in the 1950s or 1970s, but this by itself would<br />

be only slightly suggestive <strong>of</strong> a link with fallout.<br />

An additional piece <strong>of</strong> evidence for a possible<br />

association is that the high exposure group showed<br />

a higher mortality rate than the intermediate group,<br />

and both were higher than the low-exposure group.<br />

Finally, only the radiogenic leukemias (myeloid and<br />

acute) showed a temporal association with fallout.<br />

A couple <strong>of</strong> critical characteristics make this paper<br />

statistically weak, however, including the huge<br />

groupings <strong>of</strong> cases (states) and the lack <strong>of</strong> control<br />

for possible confounding factors. In addition, the<br />

exposure groups are not consistent with the recent<br />

NCI/CDC feasibility report bone marrow dose<br />

estimates (NCI 2001).<br />

The most rigorous study to address the leukemia<br />

issue was presented in 1990 by Walter Stevens,<br />

Joseph Lyon and others. They estimated doses for<br />

1,177 leukemia deaths and 5,330 matched controls<br />

from the deceased membership file <strong>of</strong> the Mormon<br />

Church. Both cases and controls were born before<br />

November 1958 and died in the period 1952-1981.<br />

This group also estimated bone marrow dose<br />

based on the Town and County Databases <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Energy’s Offsite <strong>Radiation</strong> Exposure<br />

Review Project. This study found increasing risk<br />

with dose for all ages and all types <strong>of</strong> leukemia, but<br />

this overall excess was not significant. Focusing<br />

specifically on leukemia deaths in children, a<br />

significant RR <strong>of</strong> 5.82 (1.55-21.8) was found when<br />

comparing high doses (6-30 mGy) to low doses<br />

(0-3 mGy), and a significant trend with dose was<br />

observed. Similar results were found when limiting<br />

the response to acute lymphocytic leukemia, and a<br />

significant trend was also observed when limiting<br />

observations to deaths between 1952 and 1957 (this<br />

study is discussed further in appendix A).<br />

Thyroid disease. Two studies have looked<br />

8 Johnson defined the high exposure group as people born in 1962 or earlier and diagnosed with cancer in 1958 or<br />

later. Machado et al. defined the high exposure group as people born in 1957 or earlier and dying after 1954 (<strong>of</strong><br />

leukemia or bone cancer) or after 1963 (<strong>of</strong> other cancers).<br />

9 The high-exposure states were Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina and Minnesota. The low-exposure<br />

states were California, Florida, Hawaii, New Mexico and Texas.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!