02.06.2013 Views

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in this study, suggesting that a radon dose received<br />

slowly is potentially more damaging than a radon<br />

dose received quickly.<br />

The Colorado Plateau cohort was assembled<br />

by the US Public <strong>Health</strong> Service in the early years<br />

<strong>of</strong> US mining (1950) and consists <strong>of</strong> 4,126 miners<br />

with at least one month <strong>of</strong> underground experience<br />

in the mines <strong>of</strong> the Colorado Plateau (including the<br />

“four corners” states <strong>of</strong> Colorado, New Mexico,<br />

Arizona and Utah). Roscoe (1997) found elevated<br />

SMRs for several diseases in this cohort 6 . For lung<br />

cancer and pneumoconiosis standardized rate ratios<br />

increased with increasing exposure or duration <strong>of</strong><br />

employment. Stram et al. (1999) assessed the risk<br />

patterns in this cohort with adjustments for various<br />

cancer factors and additional adjustment for dose<br />

measurement error. These authors found that risks<br />

declined with exposure age (after age 54) and were<br />

higher within the 10 or 20 years after exposure. An<br />

Uranium Miners 105<br />

Figure 8-2. Uranium mines in the US are predominantly located in the southwest and central parts <strong>of</strong> the country (www.<br />

eia.doe.gov/.../page/reserves/uresarea.html).<br />

ERR estimate <strong>of</strong> 0.0082/WLM was reported based<br />

on a model that included a smoking term and used<br />

adjusted doses. Hornung et al. analyzed the cohort<br />

periodically (1987, 1998; reviewed in Hornung<br />

2001) and have consistently shown an inverse doserate<br />

effect and have also shown that the interaction<br />

between smoking and radon appears to be more<br />

than additive but less than multiplicative 7 . Hornung<br />

(2001) gave an estimated ERR <strong>of</strong> 0.011/WLM below<br />

age 60 with lower risk estimates for older ages. Park<br />

et al. (2002) presented an alternative risk description<br />

for the Colorado Plateau cohort and calculated lost<br />

life expectancy attributable to mine work. These<br />

authors considered death from leukemia and noncancer<br />

respiratory diseases to be attributable to the<br />

mine environment in addition to lung cancer 8 ; they<br />

estimated that each year <strong>of</strong> work in an underground<br />

mine was associated with 8-9 months <strong>of</strong> lost life<br />

expectancy.<br />

6 SMRs for the following diseases were significantly elevated: pneumoconiosis (24.1, 16.0-33.7), lung cancer (5.8,<br />

5.2-6.4), tuberculosis (3.7, 1.9-6.2), chronic obstructive respiratory diseases (2.8, 1.0-3.5), emphysema (2.5, 1.9-<br />

3.2), benign and unspecified tumors (2.4, 1.0-4.6), and diseases <strong>of</strong> the blood and blood forming organs (2.4, 1.0-<br />

5.0).<br />

7 The combined risk from smoking and radon was greater than (smoking risk + radon risk) but less than (smoking risk<br />

x radon risk).<br />

8 Significantly elevated SMRs were observed for leukemia (1.8, 1.1-2.9), tuberculosis (4.5, 2.6-7.3) and diseases <strong>of</strong><br />

the respiratory system (2.9, 2.6-3.3) based on US rates.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!