Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
Health Risks of Ionizing Radiation: - Clark University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
in this study, suggesting that a radon dose received<br />
slowly is potentially more damaging than a radon<br />
dose received quickly.<br />
The Colorado Plateau cohort was assembled<br />
by the US Public <strong>Health</strong> Service in the early years<br />
<strong>of</strong> US mining (1950) and consists <strong>of</strong> 4,126 miners<br />
with at least one month <strong>of</strong> underground experience<br />
in the mines <strong>of</strong> the Colorado Plateau (including the<br />
“four corners” states <strong>of</strong> Colorado, New Mexico,<br />
Arizona and Utah). Roscoe (1997) found elevated<br />
SMRs for several diseases in this cohort 6 . For lung<br />
cancer and pneumoconiosis standardized rate ratios<br />
increased with increasing exposure or duration <strong>of</strong><br />
employment. Stram et al. (1999) assessed the risk<br />
patterns in this cohort with adjustments for various<br />
cancer factors and additional adjustment for dose<br />
measurement error. These authors found that risks<br />
declined with exposure age (after age 54) and were<br />
higher within the 10 or 20 years after exposure. An<br />
Uranium Miners 105<br />
Figure 8-2. Uranium mines in the US are predominantly located in the southwest and central parts <strong>of</strong> the country (www.<br />
eia.doe.gov/.../page/reserves/uresarea.html).<br />
ERR estimate <strong>of</strong> 0.0082/WLM was reported based<br />
on a model that included a smoking term and used<br />
adjusted doses. Hornung et al. analyzed the cohort<br />
periodically (1987, 1998; reviewed in Hornung<br />
2001) and have consistently shown an inverse doserate<br />
effect and have also shown that the interaction<br />
between smoking and radon appears to be more<br />
than additive but less than multiplicative 7 . Hornung<br />
(2001) gave an estimated ERR <strong>of</strong> 0.011/WLM below<br />
age 60 with lower risk estimates for older ages. Park<br />
et al. (2002) presented an alternative risk description<br />
for the Colorado Plateau cohort and calculated lost<br />
life expectancy attributable to mine work. These<br />
authors considered death from leukemia and noncancer<br />
respiratory diseases to be attributable to the<br />
mine environment in addition to lung cancer 8 ; they<br />
estimated that each year <strong>of</strong> work in an underground<br />
mine was associated with 8-9 months <strong>of</strong> lost life<br />
expectancy.<br />
6 SMRs for the following diseases were significantly elevated: pneumoconiosis (24.1, 16.0-33.7), lung cancer (5.8,<br />
5.2-6.4), tuberculosis (3.7, 1.9-6.2), chronic obstructive respiratory diseases (2.8, 1.0-3.5), emphysema (2.5, 1.9-<br />
3.2), benign and unspecified tumors (2.4, 1.0-4.6), and diseases <strong>of</strong> the blood and blood forming organs (2.4, 1.0-<br />
5.0).<br />
7 The combined risk from smoking and radon was greater than (smoking risk + radon risk) but less than (smoking risk<br />
x radon risk).<br />
8 Significantly elevated SMRs were observed for leukemia (1.8, 1.1-2.9), tuberculosis (4.5, 2.6-7.3) and diseases <strong>of</strong><br />
the respiratory system (2.9, 2.6-3.3) based on US rates.