to read the full report - Ecolateral by Peter Jones

More documents

Recommendations

Info

124 Evaluation of Opportunities for Converting Indigenous UK Wastes to Wastes and Energy AEA/ED45551/Issue 1 Table 65 Overview of technology, scales of operation and fuel suitability Burner type Typical size MW fuel input Fuel quality Burner Technology grate (G) or Fluidised (F) Domestic 0.015 MW Logs and pellets G Commercial 0.2 MW Wood chip G upwards most qualities Small industrial 2 MW Most dry G upwards shredded materials Large industrial 20 MW Most dry G or F heat and CHP upwards shredded materials not necessarily dry MSW mass burn 20MW Minimally G incineration upwards sorted MSW Large cofiring 100 MW Most dry n/a upwards shredded materials. Preference for pellets SRF Waste Wood Clean Wood Domestic Pellet Industrial Pellet Unsorted Waste Wet Wastes Agricultural Residues T C Fuels
Evaluation of Opportunities for Converting Indigenous UK Wastes to Wastes and Energy AEA/ED45551/Issue 1 Table 66 Risks and barriers to combustion Level of Risk Comment Technical Low to Many commercial installations, however the materials handling medium aspects have proved troublesome in the UK and there is a lack of experience. Agricultural residues and poor quality wood fuels may give high ash contents that lead to problems with boiler fouling. Wastes regulated under WID will need extensive emissions monitoring equipment. Social & Planning High High where used to produce electricity on a regional basis as it will be perceived as an incinerator irrespective of its efficiency or recycling credentials. Financial Medium Track record of delays in planning for waste projects are a disincentive. Wood and agricultural residues are OK in normal circumstances but can be delays in urban areas Regulatory Medium Receives subsidy via the Renewables Obligation. Waste incineration directive compliance is usually necessary. Co-firing waste in a utility boiler is difficult as it would require the reclassification of the whole station as an incinerator Fly ash may contain dioxin and be classed as hazardous waste. 125
Page 1 and 2:
Evaluation of Opportunities for Con
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74: Evaluation of Opportunities for Con
Page 123: Evaluation of Opportunities for Con
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189:
South East 327 - - 55% of MSW by 20
Page 192 and 193:
Appendix 3 MBT Methods Specific in
Page 194 and 195:
Figure 27 Orchid Environmental proc
show all

to read the full report - Ecolateral by Peter Jones

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?