18.08.2013 Views

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/23/2012<br />

Water Quality<br />

Objective Description<br />

Tastes and<br />

Odor<br />

Water shall not contain taste- or odor-producing substances in<br />

concentrations that impart undesirable tastes and odors to domestic or<br />

municipal water supplies, fish flesh, or other edible products of aquatic<br />

origin, or substances that cause nuisance or otherwise adversely affect<br />

beneficial uses.<br />

Toxicity All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in<br />

concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in<br />

human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective<br />

will be determined by analysis indicator organisms, species diversity,<br />

population density, growth anomalies, and biotoxicity tests as specified<br />

by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.<br />

Turbidity In terms of changes in turbidity (nephelometric turbidity units [NTU])<br />

in the receiving water body: where natural turbidity is less than 1 NTU,<br />

controllable factors shall not cause downstream turbidity to exceed 2<br />

NTU; where natural turbidity is between 1 and 5 NTU, increases shall<br />

not exceed 1 NTU; where 5 to 50 NTU, increases shall not exceed 20<br />

percent; where 50 to 100 NTU, increases shall not exceed 10 NTU;<br />

and where natural turbidity is greater than 100 NTU, increase shall not<br />

exceed 10 percent.<br />

a The criteria listed are secondary maximum concentration levels for California<br />

drinking water quality objectives that do not necessarily indicate a toxic amount of<br />

contaminant. Rather, these standards dictate water quality objectives designed to<br />

preserve taste, odor, or appearance of drinking water.<br />

The Central Valley Regional Water Board’s Clean Water Act Section 305(b) and<br />

303(d) Integrated Report for the Central Valley Region includes the North <strong>Fork</strong><br />

<strong>American</strong> <strong>River</strong>, Hell Hole reservoir, and Oxbow reservoir (Ralston afterbay) on the<br />

303(d) list of impaired waters for mercury. On October 11, 2011, the U.S.<br />

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued its final decision regarding waterbodies<br />

and pollutants proposed to be added to the current 303(b) list, and the three referenced<br />

waterbodies are included on that list (Water Board, 2012). The source of mercury in Hell<br />

Hole reservoir is listed as unknown, but the likely source for the other two waterbodies is<br />

listed as resource extraction.<br />

Physical and water chemistry conditions in the streams and rivers associated with<br />

the project are of high quality, with low concentrations of mineral constituents and other<br />

substances generally conforming to regulatory water quality objectives and standards.<br />

Historical data show that generally all of the constituents analyzed in project-affected<br />

waters (within and downstream of project impoundments) complied with current<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!