18.08.2013 Views

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/23/2012<br />

until May. Years tend to be at the extremes—either wet or dry—with high inter-annual<br />

variability, with few years receiving the “average” amount of precipitation. Mean<br />

annual precipitation and runoff in the watershed ranges from about 35 inches<br />

(308,500 acre-feet) in dry years to 94 inches (1,218,000 acre-feet) in wet years. Total<br />

project inflow (combined flows from Duncan Creek, <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Fork</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>River</strong>,<br />

Rubicon <strong>River</strong>, and Long Canyon Creek) for the period of 1975 to 2007 averages<br />

approximately 379,015 acre-feet and ranged from a low of approximately 62,638 acrefeet<br />

to a high of more than 790,820 acre-feet per year.<br />

The <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Fork</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>River</strong> watershed is heavily forested, rural in nature,<br />

and sparsely populated. There are no residential or commercial developments in the<br />

immediate project vicinity. Land use within the project boundary is focused on<br />

hydropower generation and recreation. Land use outside the project boundary is<br />

managed mainly for recreation, timber harvest, grazing, natural resource protection,<br />

and, to a lesser extent, mining.<br />

The <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Fork</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>River</strong> downstream of the project bisects federal and<br />

private lands reserved for the Auburn Dam and Reservoir <strong>Project</strong>. Reclamation began<br />

construction of this project in 1967 but the project was halted in the 1980s. In 2008, the<br />

Water Board revoked Reclamation’s water rights permits for the project. Reclamation<br />

is charged with managing the federal lands within this area and delegated this<br />

management responsibility to the California Department of Parks and Recreation. The<br />

land reserved for this project was incorporated into the state park system and is referred<br />

to as the Auburn State Recreation Area.<br />

3.2 SCOPE OF CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ANALYSIS<br />

According to the Council on Environmental Quality’s regulations for<br />

implementing National Environmental Policy Act (40 CFR § 1508.7), a cumulative<br />

effect is the impact on the environment that results from the incremental impact of the<br />

action when added to other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future actions<br />

regardless of what agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such actions.<br />

Cumulative effects can result from individually minor but collectively significant<br />

actions taking place over time, including hydropower and other land and water<br />

development activities.<br />

Based on our review of the license application and agency and public comments,<br />

we identified water quantity, water temperature, and California Central Valley steelhead<br />

as having the potential to be cumulatively affected by the proposed project in<br />

combination with other past, present, and foreseeable future activities.<br />

3.2.1 Geographic Scope<br />

The geographic scope of analysis for cumulatively affected resources defines the<br />

physical limits or boundaries of the effects of the proposed action on the resources.<br />

Because the proposed action can affect resources differently, the geographic scope for<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!