18.08.2013 Views

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/23/2012<br />

Management Plan provides few modifications to PCWA’s proposed plan, the most<br />

significant being the addition of recreational elements that synchronize the developments<br />

and schedule with the Alternative 1 Recreation Plan. Because we analyze the effects of<br />

recreation development earlier in this section, the analysis of the other content of<br />

proposed and Alternative 1 plans are similar enough that we do not analyze them<br />

separately. Additionally, Forest Service condition no. 43 states PCWA should finalize<br />

and implement the plan. We understand Alternative 1 addresses any outstanding needs<br />

the Forest Service may have had regarding the plan and, for efficiency, the analysis<br />

below is based on the Alternative 1 Transportation System Management Plan.<br />

The Transportation System Management Plan would incorporate 47 existing roads<br />

into the project and one new project road would be constructed. The plan would also<br />

incorporate 12 trails into the project and five new trails would be constructed. PCWA<br />

would be entirely responsible for routine and deferred (or periodic) maintenance on all<br />

project roads and trails as identified on tables 1 through 5 in the plan. PCWA would also<br />

enter into a collection agreement to provide funding to the Forest Service for<br />

administrative oversight for project roads and trails that are located on NFS land. PCWA<br />

would conduct condition assessments on project roads and trails once every 5 years, as<br />

well as traffic counts on project roads at a frequency as determined in consultation with<br />

the Forest Service. PCWA will consult with land management agencies annually to<br />

discuss planned actions; results of condition assessments and traffic counts; and need for<br />

traffic counts and periodic plan updates. The plan states that any new project road or trail<br />

not identified in the plan that may be needed during the term of a new license would<br />

require environmental review prior to construction.<br />

Forest Service preliminary 4(e) condition no. 43 specifies that PCWA finalize the<br />

plan and file it with the Commission after Forest Service approval. PCWA would<br />

implement this plan after Commission approval. PCWA states in its supplemental filing<br />

in November 2011 that it reached consensus with the Forest Service on the content of the<br />

Transportation System Management Plan.<br />

Our Analysis<br />

The Transportation System Management System addresses the need for accessing<br />

project features as well project recreation facilities and it appropriately identifies the level<br />

of access that would be maintained through proper annual and long-term maintenance for<br />

each access route.<br />

Providing funding to the Forest Service for administrative oversight of the roads<br />

and trails as specified in this plan would not be appropriate because PCWA already<br />

provides funding through public land use fees that it pays for the project. Performing<br />

regular condition assessments would provide essential information to determine<br />

maintenance needs. Because there is such a close relationship between the recreation<br />

facilities and transportation system it would be appropriate to synchronize the<br />

assessments for these two programs. Revising the 5-year frequency to coincide with the<br />

6-year Form 80 reporting would provide all relevant monitoring information on the same<br />

245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!