18.08.2013 Views

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/23/2012<br />

Minimum Instream Flows<br />

Various flow elements associated with hydroelectric project facilities and<br />

operations (e.g., minimum flow, pulse flows, ramping rates) can affect the aquatic and<br />

riparian environment. Reduced flow and less seasonal variation in flow associated with<br />

operation of project reservoirs and diversions may affect aquatic biota and aquatic<br />

habitat, as well as users affected by instream flows (e.g., recreational visitors, addressed<br />

in section 3.3.4, Recreation and Land Use, and power generation, addressed in section 4,<br />

Developmental Analysis). Flows that support optimal conditions, however, can differ<br />

significantly among these resources and users.<br />

PCWA’s proposed instream minimum flow regime for project bypassed reaches<br />

and the peaking reach is shown in table 3.3.2-8. Alternative 1 minimum flows are similar<br />

to the proposed minimum flows and are consistent with Forest Service condition no. 22,<br />

with the exception of the peaking reach minimum flows (which are generally from 15 to<br />

100 cfs higher than comparable months and water years under the proposed minimum<br />

flow regime) and minor differences associated with PCWA rounding flows to the nearest<br />

0.5 cfs whereas Alternative 1 (and the Forest Service) generally uses only whole<br />

numbers. Other differences between the proposed minimum flow regime and Alternative<br />

1 include the following:<br />

• Alternative 1 specifies that minimum instream flows be released by 5 p.m.,<br />

while PCWA proposes that minimum instream flows be released within 5 days<br />

of the dates specified in a new license. In both cases, exceptions would be<br />

allowed when access to the instream flow release infrastructure would be<br />

prohibited by weather or hazardous conditions.<br />

• Alternative 1 states that hourly running average flow measurements would<br />

never be less than the thresholds specified in a new license, except as<br />

authorized in advance. PCWA would maintain instantaneous flows at all times<br />

to be no less than 90 percent of the required minimum instream flow and<br />

maintain daily average flows to be equal to or above the minimum instream<br />

flow requirements on all days. PCWA proposes that instantaneous flow would<br />

at all times be no less than 90 percent of the required minimum instream flow<br />

and that daily average flow would at all times be no less than 90 percent of the<br />

required minimum instream flow. Deviations that are less than 10 percent of<br />

the required minimum instream flow would be corrected within 3 days of<br />

discovery by releasing the equivalent volume of under-released flow into the<br />

affected stream reach.<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!