18.08.2013 Views

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/23/2012<br />

long enough time to adequately assess the effects of the vegetation and pest management<br />

program.<br />

Monitoring Methylmercury Concentrations of Sportfish in <strong>Project</strong> Waters<br />

Hell Hole reservoir, Ralston afterbay, and the North <strong>Fork</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>River</strong> are on<br />

the current 303(b) list of impaired waters for mercury (Water Board, 2012). The source<br />

of mercury in Hell Hole reservoir is listed as unknown, but the likely source for the other<br />

two waterbodies is listed as resource extraction. PCWA documented during relicensing<br />

studies elevated levels of methylmercury in fish tissue in French Meadows reservoir, Hell<br />

Hole reservoir, <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Fork</strong> interbay, Ralston afterbay, and the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Fork</strong> <strong>American</strong><br />

<strong>River</strong> at Otter Creek, as well as in crayfish in Hell Hole and French Meadow reservoirs.<br />

The source of the methylmercury in the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Fork</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>River</strong> watershed is likely<br />

not related to project operations or facilities. PCWA proposes to implement a Mercury<br />

Bioaccumulation Monitoring Plan that would provide data characterizing methylmercury<br />

concentrations in the muscle tissue of sportfish from French Meadows reservoir, Hell<br />

Hole reservoir, Ralston afterbay, and the <strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Fork</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>River</strong> near Otter Creek.<br />

Monitoring would be conducted every 5 years for the term of the license beginning 3<br />

years after the license is issued. Methylmercury concentrations would be compared with<br />

OEHHA and/or EPA screening value guidelines for methylmercury (Cal/EPA, 2005;<br />

Klasing and Brodberg, 2006).<br />

Forest Service 4(e) condition no. 28 includes the Mercury Bioaccumulation<br />

Monitoring Plan among the plans that still need to be finalized. The Forest Service did<br />

not indicate if and what issues remained to be resolved to finalize the Mercury<br />

Bioaccumulation Monitoring Plan. Therefore, for the purposes of our analysis, we<br />

assume the Alternative 1 plan would essentially be the same as PCWA’s plan with the<br />

potential for additional minor modifications to occur.<br />

Our Analysis<br />

Elevated methylmercury levels in fish tissue have been reported throughout the<br />

Sierra Nevada region and have often been linked to historical mining activities, although<br />

they may also be attributable to natural causes, including geologic and atmospheric<br />

conditions. We do not expect any changes to project operations made as part of the<br />

proposed action or Alternative 1 to have any effect on methylmercury levels in fish in the<br />

project area. Methylmercury concentrations in fish tissue are likely to remain high in the<br />

future. Implementation of the proposed Mercury Bioaccumulation Monitoring Plan<br />

would track levels of methylmercury in sportfish and provide information to appropriate<br />

agencies on whether issuing health advisories for anglers at project waters is warranted.<br />

However, PCWA does not propose any substantive changes to project reservoir levels.<br />

Therefore, we do not expect any changes in methylmercury concentration levels in<br />

sportfish as a result of project operations.<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!