Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/23/2012
Condition Annualized Cost Adopted?
No. 41: Historic Properties
Management Plan
358
$41,880 Yes
No. 42: Cultural Resource Discovery Included in 41 Yes
No. 43: Transportation System
Management Plan
No. 44: Fire Management and Response
Plan
No. 45: Erosion and Sediment Control
Management
No. 46: Vegetation and Integrated Pest
Management Plan
$257,220; $256,700
(staff)
Yes, but we
modified the
frequency of
visual condition
assessments to
match Form 80
reporting intervals
$9,600 Yes
$10,800 Yes
$196,290 Yes
5.5 CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLANS
Section 10(a)(2)(A) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. § 803(a)(2)(A), requires the
Commission to consider the extent to which a project is consistent with the federal or
state comprehensive plans for improving, developing, or conserving a waterway or
waterways affected by the project. We reviewed the following 25 comprehensive plans
that are applicable to the Middle Fork American River Project, located in California.
No inconsistencies were found.
California Advisory Committee on Salmon and Steelhead Trout. 1988.
Restoring the balance: 1988 annual report. Sausalito, California. 84 pp.
California Department of Fish and Game. 1979. Rubicon River wild trout
management plan. Sacramento, California. July 1979. 46 pp.
California Department of Fish and Game. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010.
Final hatchery and stocking program environmental impact report/environmental impact
statement. Sacramento, California. January 2010.
California Department of Fish and Game. 2007. California wildlife:
Conservation challenges, California’s wildlife action plan. Sacramento, California.
2007.