Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/23/2012 Hilton, S. and T. Lisle. 1993. Measuring the fraction of pool volume filled with fine sediment. USDA Forest Service Research Note PSW-RN-414. July. Lindley, S.T., R.S. Schick et al. 2006. Historical population structure of Central Valley steelhead and its alteration by dams. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 4(1): 1-19. Lisle, T. and S. Hilton. 1999. Fine bed material in pools of natural gravel bed channels. Water Resources Research, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 1291-1304. Marchetti, M. P., and P. B. Moyle. 2001. Effects of flow regime on fish assemblages in a regulated California stream. Ecological Applications 11:530-539. Moyle, P.B. 2002. Inland fishes of California; revised and expanded. University of California Press. NERC (North American Electric Reliability Corporation). 2011. 2011 long-term reliability assessment. North American Electric Reliability Corporation, Princeton, NJ. November. NID (Nevada Irrigation District) and PG&E (Pacific Gas and Electric Company). 2009. Technical Memorandum 3-1 – 2008 Progress Report. Attachment 3-1C, Fish Population and Biomass Estimates for Level II Fish Population Monitoring Sites, Including Fish Size and Condition, July-August 2008. PG&E Drum-Spaulding Project (FERC Project No. 2310) and NID Yuba-Bear Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 2266). NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2011. United States Department of Commerce’s, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s, National Marine Fisheries Service’s, Southwest Region’s, Federal Power Act Comments, Preliminary § 18 Prescriptions, § 10(J) Recommended Conditions, § 10(a) Recommendations, and Notice of Intervention for the Middle Fork American River Hydroelectric Project, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Project No. 2079, CA. August 1. NMFS. 2009a. Public Draft Recovery Plan for the Evolutionarily Significant Units of Sacramento River Winter‐run Chinook Salmon and Central Valley Spring‐run Chinook Salmon and the Distinct Population Segment of Central Valley Steelhead. NMFS, Southwest Region, Sacramento Protected Resources Division. October 2009. NMFS. 2009b. Biological Opinion and Conference Opinion on the Long-Term Operations of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project (OCAP BiOp ). NMFS, Southwest Office, Long Beach, June 4, 2009. Available at: http://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/ocap.htm. PCWA (Placer County Water Agency). 2011a. Final application for new license for major project—existing dam, Middle Fork American River Project, FERC No. 2079. February. 362
20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/23/2012 PCWA. 2011b. Supplemental Alternative 1 filing November 30. PCWA. 2011c. Placer County Water Agency, Middle Fork American River Project, (FERC Project No. 2079), Recreation Plan. Alternative 1 Recreation Plan attached to preliminary Forest Service 4(e) filing on August 5, 2011. Prepared by Placer County Water Agency, Auburn, CA. July. PCWA. 2011d. Draft Final HPMP. November 30. PCWA. 2011e. Revised Draft HPMP. May. PCWA. 2011f. “Streamflow and Reservoir Elevation Gaging Plan.” Alternative Condition no. 31. Filed September 6, 2011. PCWA. 2010a. Invasive Mussel Protection Plan. Middle Fork American River Project, FERC No. 2079. Prepared by Placer County Water Agency. September. 12 pp. PCWA. 2010b. AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study Report. June. PCWA. 2010c. Final REC 1 report. Recreation Use and Facilities Assessment Technical Study Report. May. PCWA. 2010d. National Register report. Part of license application for Middle Fork American River Project. May. PCWA. 2009. AQ 9 – Final Geomorphology Technical Study Report – 2008. June. PCWA. 2008a. Special status plants technical study report, TERR-2. Supporting document B. Submitted with final license application on February 2011. PCWA. 2008b. Technical report LAND 1 – Transportation System Technical Study Report – 2008. PCWA. 2008c. Technical report REC 5 – Visual Quality Assessment report – 2008. PCWA. 2007a. Pre-Application Document. Middle Fork American River Project, FERC No. 2079. December 17. PCWA. 2007b. Fish and Aquatic Resources. Supporting Document F of the Preapplication Document. June 2007. PCWA. 2007c. 2006 Physical Habitat Characterization Study Report. Supporting Document G of the Pre-application Document. June 2007. PCWA. 2007d. 2006 Cultural resources inventory study report. Middle Fork American River Project, FERC No. 2079. October. Ricker, W.E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Bulletin 191. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2012. California Water Science Center. Accessed [online] at 363
Page 1 and 2:
20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial)
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
41 Table 3.3.1-1. Average number of
Page 73 and 74:
43 Site/Release Location Gravel Ini
Page 75 and 76:
45 a Q 1 - TSR, Table G-1 (PCWA, 20
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
69 Table 3.3.2-3. Hydrology for sel
Page 101 and 102:
71 Exceedances and Summary Statisti
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
91 Figure 3.3.2-6. Fish passage bar
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
105 Location American River below M
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
135 Species Name Status a Butte Cou
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
145 Table 3.3.3-5. Special-status w
Page 177 and 178:
147 Species Name Status Habitat Occ
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
195 Figure 3.3.5-1. French Meadows
Page 227 and 228:
197 Figure 3.3.5-3. Long Canyon, re
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
253 Table 3.3.6-1. Archaeological a
Page 285 and 286:
255 Resource Number Type a Descript
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
275 Table 4-2. Summary of annual co
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
279 Enhancement/Mitigation Measures
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
303 c Base 2010 costs were provided
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
307 Resource No-Action Alternative
Page 339 and 340:
309 Resource No-Action Alternative
Page 341 and 342: 311 Resource No-Action Alternative
Page 343 and 344: 20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial)
Page 349 and 350: 319 Table 5-2. Staff-recommended mi
Page 351 and 352: 321 Location Middle Fork American R
Page 391: 20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial)
Page 403 and 404: A-1
Page 405 and 406: A-3
Page 419: 20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial)
show all

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?