18.08.2013 Views

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/23/2012<br />

Modifications to operations at Hell Hole reservoir could affect other riparian<br />

resources on the reservoir shoreline and along tributaries that flow into the reservoir<br />

because vegetation would be inundated more frequently, for longer periods of time, and<br />

under deeper water. Operation changes could also reduce the amount of area for<br />

establishment of riparian plants if water surface elevations are high when seeds are<br />

dispersed and if water surface elevations continue to remain high through the growing<br />

season. Riparian trees and shrubs are well adapted to surviving anoxic soil conditions<br />

that may occur with prolonged inundation, although individuals may be susceptible to<br />

drowning if the entire plant is inundated. The timing of reservoir draw-down would not<br />

change under the proposed action. As noted in our analysis of Stebbins’ phacelia, there<br />

would be little change in the inundation pattern at Area 1, and therefore little if any<br />

expected change in the overall vegetative community in this area. The duration of<br />

inundation in Area 2a would increase by from 8 to 9 days in wet, above average, and<br />

below average water years, and in Area 2b by 22 days in wet and 15 days in above<br />

average water years compared with existing conditions. Consequently, there is the<br />

potential that, over the long term, the extent of riparian vegetation in Areas 2a and 2b<br />

may be reduced, because of the increased duration of inundation under proposed<br />

operations. In particular, young sprouts established below a water surface elevation of<br />

4,630 feet and elevations of 4,630 and 4,636 feet may be affected. Under existing<br />

conditions, riparian vegetation is present below water surface elevations of 4,630 feet)<br />

that are inundated. The timing of reservoir draw-down would not change under the<br />

proposed action. Therefore, distribution and abundance of riparian vegetation around the<br />

reservoir under the proposed action likely would be maintained compared with existing<br />

conditions. However, it is also possible that the extent of riparian vegetation at Hell Hole<br />

reservoir, in particular in Areas 2a and 2b, would be reduced. Implementation of<br />

vegetation monitoring in in both the proposed and Alternative 1 VIPMPs would enable<br />

documentation of the actual effects of the future Hell Hole reservoir management on<br />

riparian vegetation and whether remedial measures may be warranted.<br />

Effects of Proposed Changes in <strong>Project</strong> Facilities on Vegetation<br />

The effects of proposed facility modifications related to sediment management are<br />

addressed in the previous subsection. In addition, the PCWA proposed and Alternative 1<br />

Recreation Plans both call for the removal of two campsites at Hell Hole Campground,<br />

and all 13 campsites at the Upper Hell Hole Campground. A population of about<br />

47,000–94,000 individuals of Stebbins’ phacelia is documented at a recreation area at<br />

Hell Hole Vista, which currently undergoes vegetation management, road maintenance,<br />

and recreation facility maintenance. PCWA also proposes to reduce the area where<br />

routine vegetation management and heavy recreation facility maintenance activities<br />

would occur at Hell Hole Vista from 2.2 to 0.4 acre to reduce the size of the project<br />

footprint on a population of Stebbins’ phacelia.<br />

171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!