18.08.2013 Views

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/23/2012<br />

of new or modification of existing facilities, it would consult with resource agencies to<br />

review the measures included in its plan for adequacy in avoiding disturbance of these<br />

nests and roosts and obtain all appropriate permits or agreements. Alternative 1 includes<br />

implementation of the proposed Bald Eagle Management Plan.<br />

Our Analysis<br />

Increasing minimum instream flows in the bypassed and peaking reaches as well<br />

as reduced flow fluctuations in the peaking reach are expected to increase habitat and<br />

food production (aquatic macroinvertebrates) and would likely increase fish abundance,<br />

consequently increasing the prey base for bald eagles and ospreys.<br />

PCWA proposes to continue to manage project reservoirs that result in changes to<br />

surface water elevations. Sediment management activities (discussed in more detail in<br />

section 3.3.1.2, Geologic and Soils Resources) would result in a complete drawdown of<br />

<strong>Middle</strong> <strong>Fork</strong> interbay, similar to what occurs under existing conditions, and three small<br />

impoundments (Duncan Creek diversion pool, North <strong>Fork</strong> Long Canyon diversion pool,<br />

and South <strong>Fork</strong> Long Canyon diversion pool), although proposed new infrastructure at<br />

the small diversion dams would reduce the frequency of drawdowns. A fish salvage<br />

effort would occur at these reservoirs and all rescued fish would be placed downstream.<br />

The drawdowns would be temporary and would result in a temporary loss of aquatic<br />

foraging reservoir habitat and prey base, until the prey base naturally recovered.<br />

Reservoirs with partial drawdown (Ralston afterbay) would result in a temporary loss of<br />

aquatic foraging reservoir habitat. Suitable habitat in nearby rivers and reservoirs would<br />

likely provide sufficient foraging habitat and prey during the temporary drawdowns.<br />

Noise disturbance from recreation activities (e.g., boats, campers) occur during the<br />

bald eagle breeding season and have the potential to affect foraging birds. However,<br />

because the closest bald eagle nest is about 0.5 mile from Hell Hole reservoir, it is<br />

unlikely that existing nesting habitat would be disturbed by the proposed project. Upper<br />

Hell Hole Campground (located about 0.5 mile from a bald eagle nest site) would be<br />

removed under the proposed action and Alternative 1, thus reducing disturbance in the<br />

area. Proposed and Alternative 1 changes to project-related recreation sites are discussed<br />

in more detail in section 3.3.5.2, Recreation and Land Use.<br />

PCWA is proposing to stock at about 50 percent of the historical average (2001 to<br />

2009) stocking in the Hell Hole and French Meadows reservoirs. This may result in a<br />

decreased prey base for the bald eagle and osprey if another entity does not provide the<br />

full historical average stocking target; however, suitable habitat in nearby rivers and<br />

reservoirs would likely provide sufficient prey for any bald eagles and ospreys that have<br />

come to rely on these stocked fish. The Alternative 1 Recreation Plan would have<br />

PCWA providing 100 percent of the historical average of stocked fish, which would<br />

result in no change in the bald eagle or osprey prey base. Proposed and Alternative 1 fish<br />

stocking measures are discussed in more detail in section 3.3.5.2, Recreation and<br />

Land Use.<br />

180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!