Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

278 Table 4-3. Cost of environmental mitigation and enhancement measures considered in assessing the environmental effects of continuing to operate the Middle Fork Project (Source: staff). Enhancement/Mitigation Measures Entities Environmental Compliance 1. Hire additional environmental compliance staff Geology and Soils 1. Implement the Sediment Management Plan 2a. Implement the Geomorphology/ Riparian Monitoring Plan 2b. Finalize and implement the Geomorphology/ Riparian Monitoring Plan 3. Develop and implement an erosion control plan PCWA, Forest Service, California Fish and Game, staff Capital Cost (2012$) a Annual Cost (2012$) a Levelized Annual Cost (2012$) b $0 $440,640 $440,640 c PCWA, Forest Service, California Fish and Game, staff (Alternative 1) $5,770 -$40,840 -$40,380 c PCWA, staff $0 $44,060 $44,060 c Forest Service, California Fish and Game (Alternative 1) PCWA, Forest Service, California Fish and Game, staff (Alternative 1) $5,000 $44,060 $44,460 e $10,000 $10,000 $10,800 e
279 Enhancement/Mitigation Measures Entities 4. Develop a plan to identify release points when flow conduits need to be drained 5. Develop and implement a woody debris management plan Aquatic Resources 1a. Implement the proposed Instream Flow and Reservoir Minimum Pool measure 1b. Implement the Alternative 1 Instream Flow and Reservoir Minimum Pool Measure 2a. Implement the Flow and Reservoir Monitoring Plan 2b. Implement the Alternative 1 Streamflow and Reservoir Gaging Plan Forest Service, California Fish and Game, staff Forest Service, California Fish and Game, staff Capital Cost (2012$) a Annual Cost (2012$) a Levelized Annual Cost (2012$) b $10,000 $0 $800 e $5,000 $1,000 $1,400 e PCWA $2,622,830 $1,745,210 (includes $1,682,260 in lost generation [44,634 MWh]) Forest Service, California Fish and Game, Interior, staff (Alternative 1) $2,622,830 $2,068,100 (includes $2,005,147 in lost generation [53,201 MWh]) $1,955,260 c $2,278,150 d PCWA $104,910 $125,900 $134,300 c Forest Service, California Fish and Game (Alternative 1) $157,310 $130,090 $142,690 d
Page 1 and 2:
20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial)
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
41 Table 3.3.1-1. Average number of
Page 73 and 74:
43 Site/Release Location Gravel Ini
Page 75 and 76:
45 a Q 1 - TSR, Table G-1 (PCWA, 20
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
69 Table 3.3.2-3. Hydrology for sel
Page 101 and 102:
71 Exceedances and Summary Statisti
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
91 Figure 3.3.2-6. Fish passage bar
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
105 Location American River below M
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
135 Species Name Status a Butte Cou
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
145 Table 3.3.3-5. Special-status w
Page 177 and 178:
147 Species Name Status Habitat Occ
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
195 Figure 3.3.5-1. French Meadows
Page 227 and 228:
197 Figure 3.3.5-3. Long Canyon, re
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258: 20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial)
Page 283 and 284: 253 Table 3.3.6-1. Archaeological a
Page 285 and 286: 255 Resource Number Type a Descript
Page 305 and 306: 275 Table 4-2. Summary of annual co
Page 307: 20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial)
Page 311 and 312: 281 Enhancement/Mitigation Measures
Page 333 and 334: 303 c Base 2010 costs were provided
Page 337 and 338: 307 Resource No-Action Alternative
Page 349 and 350: 319 Table 5-2. Staff-recommended mi
Page 351 and 352: 321 Location Middle Fork American R
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
A-1
Page 405 and 406:
A-3
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419:
show all

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?