18.08.2013 Views

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/23/2012<br />

The ramp at Hell Hole reservoir currently provides boating access to the reservoir<br />

throughout the peak recreation season in all water year types. In general, the ramps are<br />

currently functional through the extended recreation season, in wet, above normal and<br />

below normal and dry water year types. In critical water years the ramp is available until<br />

about Labor Day and in extreme critical water years the ramp is available until around the<br />

beginning of August. If the Hell Hole boat ramp were extended to an elevation of 4,485<br />

feet, as proposed by PCWA and specified as the first phase of extension in the<br />

Alternative 1 Recreation Plan, the latter would provide additional reservoir boating<br />

during the peak recreation season in dry water year types at the lowest minimum water<br />

surface elevation but PCWA’s proposal would not. 21 Extending the boat ramp to an<br />

elevation of 4,455 feet, as specified as the second phase of extension in the Alternative 1<br />

Recreation Plan, would ensure additional boating access during the peak recreation<br />

season in critical water year types at the lowest minimum water surface elevation.<br />

Because both PCWA’s proposal and the Alternative 1 plan would extend the boat ramp,<br />

there would be greater boating access to the reservoir during the peak and extended<br />

recreation season than what currently exists. However, implementing a second phase to<br />

extend the boat ramp to elevation 4,455 feet, as the Alternative 1 plan specifies, would<br />

ensure the ramp would be functional at the minimum water surface elevation during the<br />

peak recreation season in critical water year types whereas PCWA’s proposal would not.<br />

Evaluating measures to extend boat ramps should also consider the benefit in<br />

terms of the number of recreationists that would take advantage of the additional days of<br />

boating access and potential site constraints that may prevent extending the boat ramps.<br />

Because extending the boat ramps would generally provide additional access during the<br />

extended recreation season when recreation use is low and mainly in drier water year<br />

types, the benefit of extending the ramps may be marginal. Additionally, because both<br />

PCWA and the Forest Service state that it is not known if extending the ramps is even<br />

feasible, it would be premature to require PCWA to extend the ramps to only ensure<br />

access in drier water year types. As compared to the existing conditions, PCWA’s<br />

proposal would provide additional boating access during the peak recreation season in<br />

critical water year types and during the extended recreation season there would be<br />

additional boating access in dry and critical water year types. If the Hell Hole boat ramp<br />

were further extended to an elevation of 4,455 feet, as specified in the Alternative 1 plan,<br />

there would be boating access during the peak and extended recreation seasons in all but<br />

extreme critical water year types when the ramp would be available until about the<br />

beginning of July. As compared to the existing conditions, the Alternative 1 plan would<br />

provide additional boating access during the extended recreation season in critical water<br />

year types.<br />

21 We assume that a boat ramp extended to an elevation of 4,485 feet would not be<br />

functional at a minimum reservoir elevation of 4,482 feet.<br />

228

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!