18.08.2013 Views

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

Draft EIS_072312.pdf - Middle Fork American River Project ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20120723-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/23/2012<br />

• a process for documenting and reporting inventory and monitoring results<br />

including periodic plan review and revision. Documentation would include a<br />

Forest Service-compatible GIS database for maps keyed to a narrative<br />

description of detailed, site-specific, erosion treatment measures and sediment<br />

monitoring results; and<br />

• development of erosion control guidelines for new construction or non-routine<br />

maintenance.<br />

Our Analysis<br />

The proposed erosion and sedimentation control measures provide general<br />

principles that, when applied to specific sites, should serve as effective control measures.<br />

However, the commitment to develop an erosion control plan prior to construction<br />

activities is ambiguous as to exactly when the plan would be developed and what<br />

specifically would be included in the plan.<br />

The content of the Alternative 1 erosion and sediment control management plan is<br />

much more clearly specified and would provide for periodic monitoring, inventory, and<br />

prioritized treatment of project-related erosion sites; identification of criteria and<br />

procedures for controlling erosion; development of emergency response protocols to<br />

manage erosion and sedimentation; and annual mechanisms for reporting and agency<br />

review of procedures and actions. The Alternative 1 approach would provide treatment<br />

for existing erosion sites and prevention of erosion and sedimentation associated with<br />

project infrastructure and future project actions. It would also ensure consultation with<br />

appropriate agencies in developing the plan and subsequent periodic annual review by<br />

these agencies of the plan and actions taken. Finally, the Alternative 1 approach would<br />

provide controls necessary to protect water quality and aquatic and riparian habitat from<br />

the effects of project-related erosion and sedimentation. Establishing a specific time<br />

frame for plan development (1 year from license issuance) would enable all potential<br />

ground-disturbing activities that may be included in a new license to be addressed on a<br />

site-specific basis in the plan. PCWA should only be responsible for addressing projectrelated<br />

erosion.<br />

Sediment Management<br />

Sediment management is necessary at the project’s three small diversion pools and<br />

two medium reservoirs to maintain and protect project reliability including: preserving<br />

full diversion capabilities, preventing damage to the turbines caused by coarse sediment<br />

entering the tunnels, preventing sediment accumulation in the tailraces of powerhouses,<br />

and maintaining minimum instream flow releases. Sediment management activities can<br />

also directly and indirectly affect water quality (including erosion, sedimentation, and<br />

possible introduction of hazardous chemicals) and biological resources (including<br />

riparian habitats, sensitive plants, and wildlife) through dewatering of reservoirs to<br />

facilitate sediment removal, equipment access, vegetation removal, mechanical sediment<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!