Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Hans-W. Micklitz<br />
Information provisions:<br />
• Availability, quality, correctness, completeness and comparability of<br />
information concerning <strong>the</strong> service provision;<br />
• Information about <strong>the</strong> applicable legislation and avenues of redress in <strong>the</strong><br />
case of dispute.<br />
Quotation/contract/billing:<br />
• Quotation (such as basis of calculation, commercial terms);<br />
• Minimum requirements for contractual agreements (such as written<br />
form);<br />
• Billing.<br />
Service quality requirements:<br />
• Definition of quality criteria and/or processes;<br />
• Quality management/internal and independent control;<br />
• Accessibility.<br />
Personnel:<br />
• Training, qualification, and competence of personnel.<br />
Customer satisfaction:<br />
• Collection and method of measuring of customer satisfactions<br />
evaluations;<br />
• Publication of customer satisfaction and complaint statistics;<br />
• Complaint-handling and redress.<br />
<strong>ANEC</strong>’s core elements are composed of three parts, firstly detailed substantive<br />
requirements on information, quotation, content of <strong>the</strong> contract and billing,<br />
secondly requirements on professional skills and thirdly on inspection and<br />
monitoring by using consumer satisfaction as a yardstick.<br />
II.<br />
Shaping and sharpening <strong>the</strong> concept of best practice<br />
The survey and analysis of already existing efforts to give shape to best<br />
practice has revealed uncertainty of what could and should be meant by best<br />
practice in general and in <strong>the</strong> specific field of standardisation. This does not<br />
mean that <strong>the</strong> review process turned out to be useless. The idea now is to<br />
condense <strong>the</strong> available criteria into a proper concept which should <strong>the</strong>n serve<br />
as a blueprint of analysis.<br />
100