12.05.2014 Views

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hans-W. Micklitz<br />

(3) with regard to <strong>the</strong> content of <strong>the</strong> contract, rules on <strong>the</strong> minimum content<br />

could be specified. Safety requirements remain underdeveloped, just as<br />

billing rules which are of utmost importance in <strong>the</strong> field of consumer<br />

services;<br />

(4) in terms of rights and remedies most of <strong>the</strong> EC directives and<br />

regulations contain only very basic or no rules. They define<br />

comprehensive information obligations which should be met by <strong>the</strong><br />

provider, but do not foresee any sanctions 398 . The same is true with<br />

regard to standards of care. Compliance could be secured by a strong<br />

liability regime. This is missing in most of <strong>the</strong> directives;<br />

(5) in <strong>the</strong> post-contractual stage, <strong>the</strong> directives and regulations remain<br />

certainly underdeveloped. There are no consistent rules on after-sales<br />

services, limited rules on insolvency, some and very inconsistent rules<br />

on in-house complaint handling and out of court dispute settlement<br />

procedures. Rules on collective redress are more or less lacking at all;<br />

(6) last but not least, monitoring and compliance rules do not appear in EC<br />

law relating to services.<br />

The second lesson to learn – if <strong>the</strong>re is something to learn – is <strong>the</strong> different<br />

language <strong>the</strong> EC legislator is using. Not only binding law, but also most of <strong>the</strong><br />

non-binding recommendations and guidelines, contain relatively clear<br />

messages which could ideally guide <strong>the</strong> service provider and in case, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

need, <strong>the</strong> courts, in assessing whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> provider complied with <strong>the</strong> self set<br />

standard. However, all EC rules are missing a link between <strong>the</strong> hard law, i.e. <strong>the</strong><br />

directives and regulations and <strong>the</strong> soft law, i.e. <strong>the</strong> codes, guidelines and<br />

recommendations. There is no such rule saying that if <strong>the</strong> service provider<br />

subscribes to <strong>the</strong> voluntary rules, he may be held liable exactly under <strong>the</strong>se<br />

standards. There is a first hint in <strong>the</strong> Principles of European Law on <strong>Services</strong><br />

Contracts which have been elaborated by <strong>the</strong> study group 399 . Article 1:107 (3)<br />

General Standard of Care for <strong>Services</strong> runs as follows:<br />

If <strong>the</strong> service provider is, or purports to be, a member of a group of professional<br />

service providers for which standards exist that have been set by a relevant<br />

authority or by that group itself, <strong>the</strong> service provider must exercise <strong>the</strong> care and<br />

skill expressed in <strong>the</strong>se standards.<br />

398 In its Green Paper on <strong>the</strong> review of <strong>the</strong> consumer acquis, COM (2007) 744 final, 8.2.2007,<br />

<strong>the</strong> European Commission raises <strong>the</strong> question of whe<strong>the</strong>r additional tools are needed, p.<br />

22 under 4.7.<br />

399 Principles of European Law (ed.), Service contracts, prepared by Barendrecht/Jansen/Loos/Pinna/Cascao/van<br />

Gulijk, in <strong>the</strong> context of Chapter II, IV, 3.<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!