12.05.2014 Views

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hans-W. Micklitz<br />

<strong>Services</strong> Directive 467 cannot compensate for <strong>the</strong> lack of a clear-cut regulatory<br />

framework.<br />

• The European Commission should develop a quasi-New Approach to<br />

technical standards and harmonisation of services provided<br />

that a horizontal legislative framework for <strong>the</strong> safety, quality and liability<br />

of services is first established at <strong>the</strong> European level, and provided<br />

that consumer organisations and o<strong>the</strong>r societal stakeholders are given a<br />

stronger position in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies (formula of so-called balanced<br />

representation). Whilst <strong>the</strong> European Commission seemed in principle<br />

prepared to extend <strong>the</strong> New Approach to services, <strong>the</strong> latest revision of<br />

<strong>the</strong> existing New Approach to products no longer deals with services.<br />

Such a project should openly discuss <strong>the</strong> similarities and differences<br />

between products and services. Only an official document approved in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Council, and in line with <strong>the</strong> changes noted above, could legitimise<br />

<strong>the</strong> strong involvement of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies in <strong>the</strong> field of services.<br />

• The General Product Safety Directive (GPSD) 468 should be extended to<br />

<strong>the</strong> safety of services. This Directive had been adopted to compensate<br />

for <strong>the</strong> gaps left in New Approach to products and <strong>the</strong> subsequent New<br />

Approach type directives. In this respect <strong>the</strong> European Community<br />

accepted statutory responsibility to protect <strong>the</strong> consumer’s health and<br />

safety against unsafe products. There is no reason why <strong>the</strong> safety of<br />

services can be better guaranteed through technical standardisation<br />

alone. The GPSD could easily be extended to services. Quite a number<br />

of Member States have adopted legislation to protect consumers against<br />

services as well. The proactive protection cannot and must not be left to<br />

standardisation.<br />

• The European Commission should elaborate a proposal on <strong>the</strong> liability<br />

for unsafe services. The 1991 proposal which had to be withdrawn 469<br />

could be used as a starting point that integrates <strong>the</strong> research which was<br />

initiated by <strong>the</strong> Commission itself 470 . It should be borne in mind that <strong>the</strong><br />

New Approach to products legitimated standardisation with reference to<br />

Directive 85/374/EC 471 on product liability which was said to suffice to<br />

protect consumers. In <strong>the</strong> field of services <strong>the</strong>re is not even an EC rule<br />

467 Article 26 of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Services</strong> Directive, OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, 36.<br />

468 OJ L 11, 15.1.2002, 4.<br />

469 OJ C 12, 18.1.1991, 8 et seq., withdrawn 23.6.1994 COM (1994) 260 final.<br />

470 http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/cons_safe/keydocs/index_en.htm, see under various<br />

reports.<br />

471 OJ L 210, 7.8.1985, 20.<br />

206

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!