Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Hans-W. Micklitz<br />
<strong>Services</strong> Directive 467 cannot compensate for <strong>the</strong> lack of a clear-cut regulatory<br />
framework.<br />
• The European Commission should develop a quasi-New Approach to<br />
technical standards and harmonisation of services provided<br />
that a horizontal legislative framework for <strong>the</strong> safety, quality and liability<br />
of services is first established at <strong>the</strong> European level, and provided<br />
that consumer organisations and o<strong>the</strong>r societal stakeholders are given a<br />
stronger position in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies (formula of so-called balanced<br />
representation). Whilst <strong>the</strong> European Commission seemed in principle<br />
prepared to extend <strong>the</strong> New Approach to services, <strong>the</strong> latest revision of<br />
<strong>the</strong> existing New Approach to products no longer deals with services.<br />
Such a project should openly discuss <strong>the</strong> similarities and differences<br />
between products and services. Only an official document approved in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Council, and in line with <strong>the</strong> changes noted above, could legitimise<br />
<strong>the</strong> strong involvement of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies in <strong>the</strong> field of services.<br />
• The General Product Safety Directive (GPSD) 468 should be extended to<br />
<strong>the</strong> safety of services. This Directive had been adopted to compensate<br />
for <strong>the</strong> gaps left in New Approach to products and <strong>the</strong> subsequent New<br />
Approach type directives. In this respect <strong>the</strong> European Community<br />
accepted statutory responsibility to protect <strong>the</strong> consumer’s health and<br />
safety against unsafe products. There is no reason why <strong>the</strong> safety of<br />
services can be better guaranteed through technical standardisation<br />
alone. The GPSD could easily be extended to services. Quite a number<br />
of Member States have adopted legislation to protect consumers against<br />
services as well. The proactive protection cannot and must not be left to<br />
standardisation.<br />
• The European Commission should elaborate a proposal on <strong>the</strong> liability<br />
for unsafe services. The 1991 proposal which had to be withdrawn 469<br />
could be used as a starting point that integrates <strong>the</strong> research which was<br />
initiated by <strong>the</strong> Commission itself 470 . It should be borne in mind that <strong>the</strong><br />
New Approach to products legitimated standardisation with reference to<br />
Directive 85/374/EC 471 on product liability which was said to suffice to<br />
protect consumers. In <strong>the</strong> field of services <strong>the</strong>re is not even an EC rule<br />
467 Article 26 of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Services</strong> Directive, OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, 36.<br />
468 OJ L 11, 15.1.2002, 4.<br />
469 OJ C 12, 18.1.1991, 8 et seq., withdrawn 23.6.1994 COM (1994) 260 final.<br />
470 http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/cons_safe/keydocs/index_en.htm, see under various<br />
reports.<br />
471 OJ L 210, 7.8.1985, 20.<br />
206