12.05.2014 Views

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hans-W. Micklitz<br />

d) Impact on standardisation of services<br />

These (draft) European standards and o<strong>the</strong>r documents will from <strong>the</strong> basis of<br />

analysing <strong>the</strong> degree to which standardisation of services takes core consumer<br />

elements into consideration.<br />

4. International <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies (ISO/IEC)<br />

IEC/ISO have drafted a set of policy standards which do not deal with particular<br />

services, but which focus on specific consumer concerns. COPOLCO is a<br />

political committee of ISO (not a standards committee) and suggests standards<br />

projects to ISO (such as <strong>the</strong> ISO 10001, 10002 and 10003 see below) and also<br />

produces standards development guides, policy statements and informational<br />

publications on issues of importance to consumers. <strong>ANEC</strong> is an observer in<br />

ISO/COPOLCO, whereas <strong>Consumer</strong>s International has liaison status.<br />

• Draft ISO DIS 10001 ‘Quality management – customer satisfaction –<br />

guidelines for codes of conduct for organisations’. This document is<br />

meant to service as a tool kit for developing codes of conduct, however,<br />

not in <strong>the</strong> field of services alone. The approach is very broad and<br />

comprehensive. The draft could be seen as a wish list of what<br />

consumers would like to see in a technical standard. That is why <strong>the</strong> draft<br />

helps to define what might be understood by best practice.<br />

• ISO 10002 ‘Quality Management – Customer satisfaction – Guidelines<br />

for complaints handling in organisations’. This document fits very well<br />

into Article 27 of <strong>the</strong> Service Directive which does not deal with dispute<br />

settlement but with complaints handling alone 284 .<br />

• Draft ISO DIS 10003 ‘Quality management – customer satisfaction –<br />

guidelines for dispute resolution external to organisations’. This<br />

document is envisaged as a tool kit for developing appropriate out of<br />

court settlement procedures. The draft does not reflect <strong>the</strong> two EC<br />

Recommendations 98/257/EC and 2001/310/EC 285 .<br />

• ISO/IEC Draft Guide 76 ‘Development of service standards –<br />

recommendations for addressing consumer issues’. This document is not<br />

an ISO standard. It could be understood as a wish list meant to serve as<br />

a yardstick in <strong>the</strong> elaboration of standards. The broad approach chosen<br />

is helpful in that it covers environmental protection, personal training and<br />

284 See already under Chapter III, I, 2, g).<br />

285 See already under Chapter III, I, 2, g). Legally speaking <strong>the</strong>re are no barriers why an<br />

international standard should not refer or mention to an EC recommendation.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!