12.05.2014 Views

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Services</strong> <strong>Standards</strong><br />

The Service Directive mentions “best efforts” in relation to Article 27 on dispute<br />

settlement:<br />

Member States shall take general measures necessary to ensure that providers<br />

respond to <strong>the</strong> complaint referred to in <strong>the</strong> first subparagraph in <strong>the</strong> shortest<br />

possible time and make <strong>the</strong>ir best efforts to find a satisfactory solution.<br />

But <strong>the</strong> Directive does not indicate what it means.<br />

The EC policy on <strong>the</strong> safety of services is somewhat more specific. Whilst <strong>the</strong><br />

notion of best practice is still missing in <strong>the</strong> application, it appears in <strong>the</strong><br />

research projects DG SANCO has initiated to meet <strong>the</strong> mandate of <strong>the</strong> Council<br />

Resolution. One study is entitled “Assessment of Best Practice in Fairgrounds<br />

and Amusement Parks in Relation to <strong>the</strong> Safety of <strong>Consumer</strong>s” 294 . The outline of<br />

<strong>the</strong> study to be undertaken, as formulated by <strong>the</strong> European Commission,<br />

reiterates <strong>the</strong> notion of best practice without defining it 295 . The authors of <strong>the</strong><br />

study seem to understand best practice as <strong>the</strong> one which undertakes <strong>the</strong> most<br />

comprehensive and deepest research on <strong>the</strong>se specific risks and which is<br />

regarded by experts as simply being <strong>the</strong> best available standard in that field.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> working document on <strong>the</strong> intended revision of <strong>the</strong> New Approach on<br />

standards 296 <strong>the</strong>re is one reference to best practice in “market surveillance”:<br />

Member States, it is suggested, shall have recourse to best practice and sound<br />

management of resources. They must, in particular be able to detect serious<br />

cases of non-conformity. Priority shall be given to <strong>the</strong> fields in which <strong>the</strong><br />

probability of risk is <strong>the</strong> highest or to cases which are of individual interests<br />

(complaints, accidents).<br />

The working document contains as Annex 1 a set of definitions. However, best<br />

practice is not defined. All in all <strong>the</strong> notion of best practice is slowly gaining<br />

pace, but no one has ever made an attempt to define it, at least not with regard<br />

to standardisation.<br />

a) Impact on standardisation of services<br />

The integration of best practice into Service Directive 2006/123/EC can easily<br />

be understood as a prolongation of a policy which <strong>the</strong> European Commission<br />

began in <strong>the</strong> field of financial services. What <strong>the</strong> Commission has really done is<br />

to transform best practice into a general principle that gains pace outside<br />

financial service and turns into a common device for shaping <strong>the</strong> Internal<br />

Market. At <strong>the</strong> same time, however, <strong>the</strong> strong economic efficiency bias is<br />

294 http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/cons_safe/serv_safe/reports/final_032005_en.pdf.<br />

295 The outline is reprinted in <strong>the</strong> report.<br />

296 European Commission, DG Enterprise, Certif doc 2005-16 Rev. 2, under 8.1.f) p. 21.<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!