12.05.2014 Views

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hans-W. Micklitz<br />

5. Impact on Standardisation of services<br />

The European Commission has taken a series of attempts to regulate <strong>the</strong><br />

market in services. However, so far most of <strong>the</strong> rules cover certain sectors only,<br />

mainly because <strong>the</strong> policy behind has been and still is to open-up markets. In<br />

sector-specific rules standardisation may only fill gaps left by <strong>the</strong> legislator. In<br />

essence, <strong>the</strong> regulatory framework is set by <strong>the</strong> relevant Directives. EC law<br />

defines a minimum set of binding and non-binding rules which define <strong>the</strong><br />

relationship between <strong>the</strong> service provider and <strong>the</strong> consumer. This policy has<br />

now been overruled by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Services</strong> Directive. The Service Directive rests on a<br />

different policy. The idea is not so much to define harmonised European legal<br />

rules, be <strong>the</strong>y binding or not, which shape <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> service<br />

provider and <strong>the</strong> consumer, but to use <strong>the</strong> freedom of services and <strong>the</strong> freedom<br />

of establishment as <strong>the</strong> leading concepts. Standardisation has to compensate<br />

for <strong>the</strong> absence of legal rules. In this respect standardisation within <strong>the</strong> Directive<br />

of <strong>Services</strong> has a much more prominent role to play.<br />

II.<br />

Types of services (horizontal classification)<br />

The European Commission did not rely on a vertical approach alone to set<br />

common European rules on contracts for services. Two kinds of strategies<br />

might be identified, both aiming at a horizontal regulation.<br />

1. <strong>Consumer</strong> protection regulation on services<br />

Usually, <strong>the</strong> four consumer directives, 97/7/EC 89 on distance selling,<br />

2002/65/EC 90 on distance selling for financial services, 2000/31/EC 91 on e-<br />

commerce, and 93/13/EC 92 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, are put into<br />

<strong>the</strong> same box, <strong>the</strong> one of consumer protection. However, contrary to <strong>the</strong><br />

directives on credit, package tours and time sharing, <strong>the</strong>se four directives lay<br />

down horizontal rules on consumer contracts, both for sales contracts and<br />

contracts for services. The first three are all dealing with <strong>the</strong> modalities under<br />

which <strong>the</strong> contract is concluded, i.e. <strong>the</strong> relevant distance communication<br />

means. The doubling of <strong>the</strong> distance selling regulation turned out to be <strong>the</strong><br />

result of hard lobbying of <strong>the</strong> financial services sector claiming special treatment<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> specific character of <strong>the</strong>se services. Directive 2002/65/EC on<br />

distance selling of financial services, which was adopted five years after<br />

Directive 97/7/EC on distance selling provides for particular rules on financial<br />

89 OJ L 144, 4.6.1997, 19.<br />

90 OJ L 271, 9.10.2002, 16.<br />

91 OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, 1.<br />

92 OJ L 95, 21.4.1993, 29.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!