Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Hans-W. Micklitz<br />
5. Impact on Standardisation of services<br />
The European Commission has taken a series of attempts to regulate <strong>the</strong><br />
market in services. However, so far most of <strong>the</strong> rules cover certain sectors only,<br />
mainly because <strong>the</strong> policy behind has been and still is to open-up markets. In<br />
sector-specific rules standardisation may only fill gaps left by <strong>the</strong> legislator. In<br />
essence, <strong>the</strong> regulatory framework is set by <strong>the</strong> relevant Directives. EC law<br />
defines a minimum set of binding and non-binding rules which define <strong>the</strong><br />
relationship between <strong>the</strong> service provider and <strong>the</strong> consumer. This policy has<br />
now been overruled by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Services</strong> Directive. The Service Directive rests on a<br />
different policy. The idea is not so much to define harmonised European legal<br />
rules, be <strong>the</strong>y binding or not, which shape <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> service<br />
provider and <strong>the</strong> consumer, but to use <strong>the</strong> freedom of services and <strong>the</strong> freedom<br />
of establishment as <strong>the</strong> leading concepts. Standardisation has to compensate<br />
for <strong>the</strong> absence of legal rules. In this respect standardisation within <strong>the</strong> Directive<br />
of <strong>Services</strong> has a much more prominent role to play.<br />
II.<br />
Types of services (horizontal classification)<br />
The European Commission did not rely on a vertical approach alone to set<br />
common European rules on contracts for services. Two kinds of strategies<br />
might be identified, both aiming at a horizontal regulation.<br />
1. <strong>Consumer</strong> protection regulation on services<br />
Usually, <strong>the</strong> four consumer directives, 97/7/EC 89 on distance selling,<br />
2002/65/EC 90 on distance selling for financial services, 2000/31/EC 91 on e-<br />
commerce, and 93/13/EC 92 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, are put into<br />
<strong>the</strong> same box, <strong>the</strong> one of consumer protection. However, contrary to <strong>the</strong><br />
directives on credit, package tours and time sharing, <strong>the</strong>se four directives lay<br />
down horizontal rules on consumer contracts, both for sales contracts and<br />
contracts for services. The first three are all dealing with <strong>the</strong> modalities under<br />
which <strong>the</strong> contract is concluded, i.e. <strong>the</strong> relevant distance communication<br />
means. The doubling of <strong>the</strong> distance selling regulation turned out to be <strong>the</strong><br />
result of hard lobbying of <strong>the</strong> financial services sector claiming special treatment<br />
due to <strong>the</strong> specific character of <strong>the</strong>se services. Directive 2002/65/EC on<br />
distance selling of financial services, which was adopted five years after<br />
Directive 97/7/EC on distance selling provides for particular rules on financial<br />
89 OJ L 144, 4.6.1997, 19.<br />
90 OJ L 271, 9.10.2002, 16.<br />
91 OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, 1.<br />
92 OJ L 95, 21.4.1993, 29.<br />
30