12.05.2014 Views

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Services</strong> <strong>Standards</strong><br />

information requirements beyond <strong>the</strong> level foreseen by <strong>the</strong> Directive. Strictly<br />

speaking Article 22 even bars European <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies from developing<br />

information requirements which go beyond <strong>the</strong> Article 22 requirements. The<br />

voluntary character of European standards does not set aside <strong>the</strong><br />

consequences resulting from Article 22. O<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>the</strong> objective, to lay down a<br />

final set of requirements which can be taken from Article 22, would be<br />

circumvented, for example if CEN is elaborating information standards which<br />

reach beyond <strong>the</strong> level provided for in Article 22.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, European standards might help to develop a common, i.e.<br />

European framework for companies that have decided to settle on <strong>the</strong> territory<br />

of <strong>the</strong> host country. As Member States are in principle free to impose additional<br />

information requirements on companies that have settled, European <strong>Standards</strong><br />

Bodies could contribute to avoid deviating national standards. As a starting<br />

point, European <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies could take <strong>the</strong> Article 22 requirements as a<br />

yardstick and try to make <strong>the</strong>m apply to companies that are settling in <strong>the</strong><br />

Member States.<br />

European <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies as well as National <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies are well<br />

advised to check information requirements in technical standards on services<br />

against <strong>the</strong> content of Article 22, in order to avoid duplication and in order to<br />

contribute to a common approach on cross border services and on services that<br />

are provided by a company that has settled in <strong>the</strong> Member States.<br />

d) Professional liability insurance and guarantees<br />

Member States are free to require that providers whose services present a<br />

direct and particular risk to health and safety of <strong>the</strong> recipient or a third person,<br />

or <strong>the</strong> financial security of <strong>the</strong> recipient, subscribe to a professional insurance<br />

appropriate to <strong>the</strong> nature and extent of <strong>the</strong> risk, or provide a guarantee or<br />

similar which is equivalent or essentially comparable as regards its purpose<br />

(Article 23 (1)). However, Member States are obliged to recognise equivalent<br />

guarantees given by ano<strong>the</strong>r Member State in which <strong>the</strong> provider is already<br />

established (Article 23 (2)). The Commission may establish common criteria for<br />

defining when equivalence is supposed to exist, subsequent to <strong>the</strong> comitology<br />

procedure (Article 23 (4)).<br />

It is here where <strong>the</strong> Commission’s overall policy from pre-market control through<br />

public law to post-market control through private law, becomes evident 226 . The<br />

non-mandatory professional liability standards will compensate <strong>the</strong> consumer<br />

226 See Chapter I and II.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!