Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Hans-W. Micklitz<br />
number of similarities and common issues such as <strong>the</strong> concept of universal<br />
service, <strong>the</strong> different network services remain legally separated.<br />
The same phenomenon may be observed in <strong>the</strong> field of standardisation.<br />
Historically speaking standard-making is business-induced. This means that <strong>the</strong><br />
business circles which need a specific technical standard will support its<br />
elaboration. It is a bottom-up and not a top-down approach. Sector-specific<br />
initiatives may not create frictions as long as <strong>the</strong>y are bound to merely<br />
standardising technical specifications. However, once <strong>the</strong>y overstep <strong>the</strong>se<br />
boundaries and enter into areas that affect public policy issues such as safety<br />
or security or contract making or complaint handling, sector-specific approaches<br />
may end up in confusion, if similar or identical issues are dealt with differently 425 .<br />
It might suffice to refer to complaint handling and dispute resolution. Most of <strong>the</strong><br />
technical standards being studied here provide for some sort of complaint<br />
handling, dispute resolution and management of consumer satisfaction. It is one<br />
thing that <strong>the</strong> technical standards do not take <strong>the</strong> relevant EC recommendations<br />
into account, however, it is ano<strong>the</strong>r that <strong>the</strong> stipulations in <strong>the</strong> relevant<br />
standards seem in no way coordinated. Each technical committee, dealing with<br />
complaint handling and dispute resolution seems to proceed on its own<br />
understanding.<br />
The deficiencies in both areas in law making and standards making are<br />
revealed by <strong>the</strong> horizontal character of consumer protection. <strong>Consumer</strong><br />
protection is needed whenever a service is supplied to <strong>the</strong> final consumer,<br />
independent of <strong>the</strong> type of services. In this respect consumer law can be<br />
understood as a device that puts pressure on legislators and standardisers to<br />
look more systematically into <strong>the</strong> field <strong>the</strong>y intend to regulate and/or<br />
standardise.<br />
6. Proactive and retroactive standardisation<br />
At least at <strong>the</strong> European level standardisation of services is mainly retroactive.<br />
The National and European <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies take action in <strong>the</strong> shadow of a<br />
forthcoming EC directive or regulation. Then standardisation is no longer<br />
voluntary. It is top-down standardisation. The European Commission, i.e. <strong>the</strong><br />
legislator becomes <strong>the</strong> key player and it designates specific tasks to <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Standards</strong> Bodies. This is abundantly clear in postal services and services<br />
coming under <strong>the</strong> <strong>Services</strong> Directive. In both cases, <strong>the</strong> EC legislator had linked<br />
425 Comment of an <strong>ANEC</strong> observer to <strong>the</strong> author, stressing <strong>the</strong> need for a more horizontal<br />
approach, where appropriate.<br />
190