12.05.2014 Views

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

Services Standards: Defining the Core Consumer Elements ... - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hans-W. Micklitz<br />

number of similarities and common issues such as <strong>the</strong> concept of universal<br />

service, <strong>the</strong> different network services remain legally separated.<br />

The same phenomenon may be observed in <strong>the</strong> field of standardisation.<br />

Historically speaking standard-making is business-induced. This means that <strong>the</strong><br />

business circles which need a specific technical standard will support its<br />

elaboration. It is a bottom-up and not a top-down approach. Sector-specific<br />

initiatives may not create frictions as long as <strong>the</strong>y are bound to merely<br />

standardising technical specifications. However, once <strong>the</strong>y overstep <strong>the</strong>se<br />

boundaries and enter into areas that affect public policy issues such as safety<br />

or security or contract making or complaint handling, sector-specific approaches<br />

may end up in confusion, if similar or identical issues are dealt with differently 425 .<br />

It might suffice to refer to complaint handling and dispute resolution. Most of <strong>the</strong><br />

technical standards being studied here provide for some sort of complaint<br />

handling, dispute resolution and management of consumer satisfaction. It is one<br />

thing that <strong>the</strong> technical standards do not take <strong>the</strong> relevant EC recommendations<br />

into account, however, it is ano<strong>the</strong>r that <strong>the</strong> stipulations in <strong>the</strong> relevant<br />

standards seem in no way coordinated. Each technical committee, dealing with<br />

complaint handling and dispute resolution seems to proceed on its own<br />

understanding.<br />

The deficiencies in both areas in law making and standards making are<br />

revealed by <strong>the</strong> horizontal character of consumer protection. <strong>Consumer</strong><br />

protection is needed whenever a service is supplied to <strong>the</strong> final consumer,<br />

independent of <strong>the</strong> type of services. In this respect consumer law can be<br />

understood as a device that puts pressure on legislators and standardisers to<br />

look more systematically into <strong>the</strong> field <strong>the</strong>y intend to regulate and/or<br />

standardise.<br />

6. Proactive and retroactive standardisation<br />

At least at <strong>the</strong> European level standardisation of services is mainly retroactive.<br />

The National and European <strong>Standards</strong> Bodies take action in <strong>the</strong> shadow of a<br />

forthcoming EC directive or regulation. Then standardisation is no longer<br />

voluntary. It is top-down standardisation. The European Commission, i.e. <strong>the</strong><br />

legislator becomes <strong>the</strong> key player and it designates specific tasks to <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Standards</strong> Bodies. This is abundantly clear in postal services and services<br />

coming under <strong>the</strong> <strong>Services</strong> Directive. In both cases, <strong>the</strong> EC legislator had linked<br />

425 Comment of an <strong>ANEC</strong> observer to <strong>the</strong> author, stressing <strong>the</strong> need for a more horizontal<br />

approach, where appropriate.<br />

190

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!